Intergroup and Intragroup Aspects of Leadership in Social Dilemmas: A Relational Model of Cooperation

By David de Cremer, M. van Vugt. 2002

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed148c644a5f9ee5075bd1c5ae35fd08b99fdb9f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

1. D. van Knippenberg
2. Eric van Dijk
3. David de Cremer
4. P. V. van Lange
5. M. Hogg
6. Daniel Balliet
7. Barbara van Knippenberg

In Social Psychology

1. D. van Knippenberg
2. David de Cremer
3. Eric van Dijk
4. M. Hogg
5. Barbara van Knippenberg
6. Eugene Yu Jin Tee
7. Tom Tyler
8. Russell S. Cropanzano

In Sociology and Political Science

1. David de Cremer
2. D. van Knippenberg
3. Eric van Dijk
4. M. Hogg
5. Gerben A. van Kleef
6. Barbara van Knippenberg
7. Tom Tyler
8. Russell S. Cropanzano

Citations in the corpus

• Cooperation with leaders in social dilemmas: On the effects of procedural fairness and outcome favorability in structural cooperation (2003, background): “Several theoretical perspectives converge on the conclusion that the fairness of the procedure used by the leader to affect group members outcomes also plays a key role in determining group member cooperation (De Cremer & Van Vugt, 2002).”
• When and why leaders put themselves first: leader behaviour in resource allocations as a function of feeling entitled (2005, methodology): “However, we based our experimental procedure on existing methodologies (De Cremer & Van Vugt, 2002; Samuelson & Allison, 1994) showing, for example, that allocating participants to different roles by means of a chance procedure is considered to be fair and legitimate.”