Competing Arguments for the Geometry Course: Why Were American High School Students Supposed to Study Geometry in the Twentieth Century?
By Gloriana González, Patricio G. Herbst. 2006
60 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec3867a6e0ef78c4eb2af9a6068f730d26bc05aa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Michael Weiss
- Chia-ling Chen
- K. Luneta
Citations in the corpus
- Teachers’ perspectives on “authentic mathematics” and the two-column proof form (2009, background): “Various arguments have been made over time to justify the value of such a curricular stake; these arguments virtually associate it to each of the notions of authenticity noted above (González and Herbst 2006; Herbst 2002a).”
- Understanding students’ misconceptions: An analysis of final Grade 12 examination questions in geometry (2015, background): “According to González and Herbst (2006), geometry is the only high school subject in which students routinely deal with the necessary consequences of abstract properties and in which students are held accountable for reading, writing and understanding mathematical proofs.”