The neural correlates of language production
By Peter Indefrey, Willem J. M. Levelt. 2000
362 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ebc9f07eea0799a617630c452143f72b7e1b45bc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Peter Indefrey
- Gregory Hickok
- Peter Hagoort
- B. Buchsbaum
- Colin J. Humphries
- Nina F. Dronkers
- David Poeppel
- Peter E. Turkeltaub
Citations in the corpus
- Reversed lateralization of temporal activation during speech production in thought disordered patients with schizophrenia (2002, background): “The articulation of speech is probably the most complex yet also the most automatic motor skill (Indefrey & Levelt, 2000).”
- Role of left posterior superior temporal gyrus in phonological processing for speech perception and production (2001, background): “In fact, Indefrey and Levelt (2000) have suggested that access to phonological codes may be supported by the left pSTG, whereas processes such as syllabification may be supported by left frontal structures.”
- Auditory–Motor Interaction Revealed by fMRI: Speech, Music, and Working Memory in Area Spt (2003, background): “Evidence for this idea comes from a range of studies including lesion work (for reviews, see Hickok, 2000, 2001), cortical stimulation (Anderson et al., 1999), fMRI and PET (Hickok et al., 2000; Indefrey & Levelt, 2000 ), and MEG (Levelt, Praamstra, Meyer, Helenius, & Salmelin, 1998).”
- A Case-Series Test of the Interactive Two-Step Model of Lexical Access: Evidence from Picture Naming. (2006, unknown): “…(e.g., Belke, Meyer, & Damian, 2005; Bock, 1996; Buchsbaum, Hickok, & Humphries, 2001; Glaser & Dungelhoff, 1984; Griffin & Bock, 2000; Indefrey et al., 2001; Indefrey & Levelt, 2000; Meyer, 1996; Meyer, Sleiderink, & Levelt, 1998; Schriefers, Meyer, & Levelt, 1990; Smith & Wheeldon, 1999).”
- Meta-Analysis of the Functional Neuroanatomy of Single-Word Reading: Method and Validation (2002, background): “, 1998), a handful have attempted to describe the neural substrates of a single task using meta-analytic techniques (Farah and Aguirre, 1999; Indefrey and Levelt, 2000).”
- Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. (2004, background): “Indefrey and Levelt (2000) in their review of available studies on word production also identify the left posterior superior and middle temporal gyri as important sites for accessing word codes.”
- The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. (2004, methodology): “While the left anterior insula and the right SMA did not show the same pattern in Indefrey and Levelt (2000), 4 the present meta-analysis confirms the earlier findings with respect to Wernicke's area.”
- A Meta‐analysis of Hemodynamic Studies on First and Second Language Processing: Which Suggested Differences Can We Trust and What Do They Mean? (2006, methodology): “Picture-naming is better understood and the neural correlates of L1 picture-naming have been examined and compared to other word production tasks in two comprehensive meta-analyses (Indefrey & Levelt, 2000, 2004).”
- The Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Word Production Components: A Critical Update (2011, background): “These tasks differ with respect to the cognitive processes preceding word production as such, which have been termed lead-in processes by Indefrey and Levelt (2000).”
- The neurobiology of language beyond single words. (2014, methodology): “The activation foci and the spatial extent of 198 contrasts were coded in an anatomical reference system of 112 regions on the basis of the stereotaxic atlas of Talairach & Tournoux (1988) (for details, see caption to Supplemental Table 2 and Indefrey & Levelt 2000, 2004).”