The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components.

By Peter Indefrey, Willem J. M. Levelt. Cognition, 2004

1,871 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23e7e3c6924b0d4a3ae314d85f6cd7a877e14fca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The cortical dynamics of speaking: present shortcomings and future avenues (2016, background): “For instance, those models solely relying on sequential hierarchical brain dynamics argue that activation in the motor cortex is only functionally involved near the end of speech preparation in order to trigger a motor programme to the vocal folds (e.g. Indefrey, 2011; Indefrey & Levelt, 2004).”
A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 (2008, methodology): “With respect to language production, a meta-analysis of 82 imaging studies found that the left MTG was the only area that was reliably activated for tasks that required lexical selectio”
Prelexical and lexical processing in listening (2004, positive): “Reliability estimate . Reliability estimates were calculated using the procedure of Indefrey and Levelt (2000, 2003) .”
The Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Word Production Components: A Critical Update (2011, methodology): “Keywords: language production, word production, picture naming, neuroimaging”
Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing (2006, result): “This approach appears complementary to recent reviews on language that investigated one language component (word processing (Indefrey and Levelt, 2004; Price, 2000), semantic processing (Bookheimer, 2002), sentence processing (Friederici, 2002)) and confronted a reduced number of investigations to…”
Motor movement matters: The flexible abstractness of inner speech (2010, neutral): “theory (see, e.g., Indefrey & Levelt, 2004) ,”
A Meta‐analysis of Hemodynamic Studies on First and Second Language Processing: Which Suggested Differences Can We Trust and What Do They Mean? (2006, methodology): “Picture-naming is better understood and the neural correlates of L1 picture-naming have been examined and compared to other word production tasks in two comprehensive meta-analyses (Indefrey & Levelt, 2000, 2004).”
Sensorimotor Integration in Speech Processing: Computational Basis and Neural Organization (2011, neutral): “…are not necessarily limited to) auditory-related cortices in the posterior superior temporal sulcus/gyrus (de Zubicaray and McMahon , 2009; Edwards et al., 2010; Graves et al., 2007; Graves et al., 2008; Indefrey and Levelt, 2004; Levelt et al., 1998; Okada and Hickok, 2006; Wilson et al., 2009 ).”
Digits vs. pictures: The influence of stimulus type on language switching (2012, neutral): “Prior to articulation in the intended language, concepts go from the activation of semantic concepts via lexical selection to phonological processing (see, e.g., Indefrey & Levelt, 2004; Levelt, Roelofs, & Meyer, 1999).”
A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading (2012, background): “…Broca's area, BA 44) was associated with forming or dividing words into syllables (syllabification) during both covert (silent speech) and overt (speaking aloud) production (Indefrey and Levelt, 2004; Callan et al., 2006) or translating speech into articulatory code (Hickok and Poeppel, 2004).”
Where does the delay in L2 picture naming come from? Psycholinguistic and neurocognitive evidence on second language word production (2011, methodology): “However, we can rely on previous work linking brain regions to processing stages of word production (Indefrey & Levelt, 2004 ) and thus indirectly conclude that if a brain region shows a different magnitude of haemodynamic activation in L2 compared to L1 picture naming, then there is also some func”
Becoming syntactic. (2006, background): “Studies of aphasia and other pathologies (e.g., Ullman, 2001) and functional imaging studies (e.g., Indefrey & Levelt, 2004; Levelt, Praamstra, Meyer, Helenius, & Salmelin, 1998) associate frontal and temporal–parietal areas with distinct functions, frontal areas being associated more with syntax…”