Role of left posterior superior temporal gyrus in phonological processing for speech perception and production

By B. Buchsbaum, Gregory Hickok, Colin J. Humphries. Cognitive Sciences, 2001

425 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d6c042090aa32057ae5d1fc35d68f5017d74a5d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Gregory Hickok
2. David Poeppel
3. Cathy J. Price
4. Frank H. Guenther
5. B. Buchsbaum
6. John F. Houde
7. Mark D'Esposito
8. Feng Rong

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Gregory Hickok
2. David Poeppel
3. Cathy J. Price
4. Frank H. Guenther
5. John F. Houde
6. Feng Rong
7. B. Buchsbaum
8. Mohamed L. Seghier

Citations in the corpus

• Sensorimotor Integration in Speech Processing: Computational Basis and Neural Organization (2011, positive): “…broadly, Spt is situated in the middle of a network of auditory (superior temporal sulcus) and motor (pars opercularis, premotor cortex) regions (Buchsbaum et al., 2001; Buchsbaum et al., 2005; Hickok et al., 2003), perfectly positioned both functionally and anatomically to support sensorimotor…”
• Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. (2004, methodology): “These STS regions also show sustained activation during the active maintenance (silent rehearsal) of phonological information ( Buchsbaum, Hickok, & Humphries, 2001; Hickok et al., 2003).”
• The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as 'asymmetric sampling in time' (2003, background): “An acoustic– phonetic–articulatory coordinate transformation occurs in a dorsal pathway (Buchsbaum et al., 2001) that links auditory representations to motor representations in superior temporal/parietal areas.”
• Auditory–Motor Interaction Revealed by fMRI: Speech, Music, and Working Memory in Area Spt (2003, background): “…47, z = 4), but see below for further discussion of hemisphere differences in the STS. Auditory and rehearsal foci were also noted in the posterior frontal cortex including the lateral premotor and inferior frontal gyrus, consistent with our previous report (Buchsbaum et al., 2001) (see Figure 1).”
• Cortical interactions underlying the production of speech sounds. (2006, methodology): “The activation peak was located in the posterior end of the left planum temporale (crosshairs in Figure 4); this area has been implicated as an auditorymotor interface for speech ( Buchsbaum, Hickok, & Humphries, 2001; Hickok, Buchsbaum, Humphries, & Muftuler, 2003).”
• Computational neuroanatomy of speech production (2012, background): “Modern findings instead implicate a cortical system that computes a sensorimotor coordinate transformation 43,44,83,89 .”
• Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing (2006, background): “…by Hickok et al., who reported coactivation of the PT and the posterior superior temporal gyrus in the temporal lobe during both speech listening and covert speech production (Buchsbaum et al., 2001; Hickok et al., 2003; Okada et al., 2003), together with the motor regions, i.e., the inferior Fig.”
• The Search for the Phonological Store: From Loop to Convolution (2008, background): “First, the studies by Hickok et al. (2003) and Buchsbaum et al. (2001) show that the parietal lobe does not meet the minimal logical requirements for the ‘‘neural correlate’’ of the phonological store because it does not activate during both auditory perception and covert rehearsal.”
• The left superior temporal gyrus is a shared substrate for auditory short-term memory and speech comprehension: evidence from 210 patients with stroke (2009, positive): “Recent event-related functional MRI investigations of auditory short-term memory showed activation in this region and also in areas of the inferior parietal lobe (Becker et al., 1999; Buchsbaum et al., 2001).”
• The functional significance of EEG microstates - Associations with modalities of thinking (2016, positive): “These left–right topography differences for microstate classes B and C might again reflect increased inhibitory activity in left-lateralized areas of verbal processing (Buchsbaum et al., 2001; LLoyd, 2007; Vigneau et al., 2006) and decreased inhibitory activity in right-lateralized areas of spatial-”
• Speech Production as State Feedback Control (2011, background): “In particular, a variety of studies have implicated the posterior superior temporal gyrus (STG; Zheng et al., 2009) and the superior parietal temporal area (Spt; Buchsbaum et al., 2001; Hickok et al., 2003) as serving feedback processing specifically related to speech production.”
• The cortical organization of speech processing (2007, background): “, and during active maintenance of phonemic informatio”
• Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. (2006, background): “…have demonstrated an area within the left posterior Sylvian fissure at the junction of the temporal and parietal lobes (area SPT) and another in the lateral posterior superior temporal gyrus/sulcus that respond during speech perception and production (Buchsbaum et al., 2001; Hickok et al., 2004).”