A Meta‐analysis of Hemodynamic Studies on First and Second Language Processing: Which Suggested Differences Can We Trust and What Do They Mean?

By Peter Indefrey. 2006

263 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2812fb94c0cc3b2a70953b5e06fe0ad55a71aed0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

ASSESSING SECOND-LANGUAGE ORAL PROFICIENCY FOR RESEARCH (2016, unknown): “…a key factor (and even the most important factor; Abutalebi, Cappa, & Perani, 2001 ) affecting the language system of bilinguals in various reviews and meta-analyses of neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies (Abutalebi, 2008 ; Indefrey, 2006 ; Kotz, 2009 ; Steinhauer, White, & Drury, 2009 ).”
Is it time to leave behind the Revised Hierarchical Model of bilingual language processing after fifteen years of service (2010, background): “Indefrey, P. (2006). A meta-analysis of hemodynamic studies”
Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels (2010, unknown): “In this review article, we discuss a selected set of articles that used one particular neurocognitive method, event-related brain potentials (ERPs), to study L2 learning (for reviews on other neuroimaging techniques and L2 learning, see Indefrey, 2006; Abutalebi and Green, 2007).”
What is special about L3 processing?* (2013, background): “Indefrey (2006, 2007) argues that through use the brain may be optimized for the native language and that therefore using another language is more costly in terms of resources.”
The Declarative/Procedural Model (2020, background): “One class of models posits that the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying L2 are essentially the same as those subserving L1 (Abutalebi, 2008; Ellis, 2005; Green, 2003; Hernandez, Li, & MacWhinney, 2005; Indefrey, 2006; MacWhinney, 2011; Perani & Abutalebi, 2005).”
Where does the delay in L2 picture naming come from? Psycholinguistic and neurocognitive evidence on second language word production (2011, background): “The typical finding is that these two types of bilinguals do not differ in the regions which are activated by language tasks, but in the degree of activation in these areas (for overviews see Abutalebi, Cappa, & Perani, 2001; Indefrey, 2006; Perani & Abutalebi, 2005), with late bilinguals having a g”