Auditory–Motor Interaction Revealed by fMRI: Speech, Music, and Working Memory in Area Spt

By Gregory Hickok, B. Buchsbaum, Colin J. Humphries, T. Muftuler. 2003

641 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5dae7d4a092adf8cb43490403a1c160723c424dc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Speech Production as State Feedback Control (2011, background): “In particular, a variety of studies have implicated the posterior superior temporal gyrus (STG; Zheng et al., 2009) and the superior parietal temporal area (Spt; Buchsbaum et al., 2001; Hickok et al., 2003) as serving feedback processing specifically related to speech production.”
Chunking in Music by Coarticulation (2010, background): “There are suggestions that the strong links between listening and sensations of movement are neurophysiologically ‘hard wired’ (Kohler et al. 2002, Hickok et al. 2003), but also suggestions that sound-motor links in music perception are enhanced with training as can be seen in the case of expert…”
Cortical interactions underlying the production of speech sounds. (2006, methodology): “The activation peak was located in the posterior end of the left planum temporale (crosshairs in Figure 4); this area has been implicated as an auditorymotor interface for speech (Buchsbaum, Hickok, & Humphries, 2001; Hickok, Buchsbaum, Humphries, & Muftuler, 2003 ).”
When the brain plays music: auditory–motor interactions in music perception and production (2007, background): “suggest that posterior auditory regions at the parieto-temporal boundary are crucial nodes in the auditory–motor interface, mapping auditory representations onto motor representations of speech, and also melodie”
The Search for the Phonological Store: From Loop to Convolution (2008, background): “First, the studies by Hickok et al. (2003) and Buchsbaum et al. (2001) show that the parietal lobe does not meet the minimal logical requirements for the ‘‘neural correlate’’ of the phonological store because it does not activate during both auditory perception and covert rehearsal.”
Shared networks for auditory and motor processing in professional pianists: Evidence from fMRI conjunction (2006, background): “The left prevalence in the professionals may also be accounted for by different levels of expertise: Hickok et al. (2003) for instance, found the left middle temporal gyrus to be more active for speech tasks, but the right middle temporal gyrus to be more active for music tasks.”
Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing (2006, background): “…by Hickok et al., who reported coactivation of the PT and the posterior superior temporal gyrus in the temporal lobe during both speech listening and covert speech production (Buchsbaum et al., 2001; Hickok et al., 2003; Okada et al., 2003), together with the motor regions, i.e., the inferior Fig.”
Rethinking the neurological basis of language (2005, methodology): “We will use the data contained in Table 1 as a basis for discussion of three existing hypotheses concerning the contribution of Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas to language processing.”
The role of mirror neurons in speech perception and action word semantics (2010, background): “But is there any evidence in support of a motor theory of speech perception? There is certainly good behavioural evidence for the existence of a tight connection between speech perception and speech production (see recent review in Galantucci et al, 2006 ), and there are numerous demonstrations tha”
Eight Problems for the Mirror Neuron Theory of Action Understanding in Monkeys and Humans (2009, result): “This is consistent with many claims regarding the sensory–motor nature of working memory systems (Pa, Wilson, Pickell, Bellugi, & Hickok, in press; Buchsbaum & D’Esposito, 2008; Postle, 2006; Hickok, Buchsbaum, Humphries, & Muftuler, 2003; Ruchkin et al., 2003; Wilson, 2001).”
Computational neuroanatomy of speech production (2012, background): “Modern findings instead implicate a cortical system that computes a sensorimotor coordinate transformation 43,44,83,89 .”
A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading (2012, background): “For example, the practice of functionally defining a region of interest that is commonly activated by auditory inputs and covert articulation (Hickok et al., 2003) might artificially merge distinct auditory and motor regions in the ventral and dorsal surfaces of the sylvian fissure particularly…”
Mental concerts: musical imagery and auditory cortex. (2005, background): “Hickok et al. (2003) found that training in auditory imagery improved harmony skills in children.area Spt (parietal-temporal boundary) responded to both imagined auditory (both speech and music) and The research described above can also help illuminate how musicians use mental practice.”
Sensorimotor Integration in Speech Processing: Computational Basis and Neural Organization (2011, positive): “…of auditory (superior temporal sulcus) and motor (pars opercularis, premotor cortex) regions (Buchsbaum et al., 2001; Buchsbaum et al., 2005; Hickok et al., 2003), perfectly positioned both functionally and anatomically to support sensorimotor integration for speech and related vocal-tract…”