Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education: Theory and applications.
By Jacqueline P. Leighton, Mark J. Gierl. 2007
385 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb7388b4531dc2440370d93fe9b0f0d6adcf4215
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Changjiang Wang
- Jiawen Zhou
- A. Kim
- Jonathan Templin
- Mark J. Gierl
- Andre A. Rupp
- Paul J Silvia
- Roger E. Beaty
Citations in the corpus
- Unique Characteristics of Diagnostic Classification Models: A Comprehensive Review of the Current State-of-the-Art (2008, background): “This context is particularly representative of current trends in cognitively diagnostic educational assessment (Leighton & Gierl, 2007; Nichols, Chipman, & Brennan, 1995).”
- Exploring ways to provide diagnostic feedback with an ESL placement test: Cognitive diagnostic assessment of L2 reading ability (2015, background): “That is, attributes are domain-specific skills and knowledge that are needed to demonstrate mastery in a cognitive domain (Chipman, Nichols, & Brennan, 1995; Leighton & Gierl, 2007).”
- Educational Measurement (4th ed.) (2009, neutral): “Finally, apart from a short discussion by Mislevy, there is little space for categorical latent structures as, for instance, used in cognitive diagnostic models (Junker & Sijtsma, 2001; Leighton & Gierl, 2007).”
- A Psychometric Network Perspective on the Validity and Validation of Personality Trait Questionnaires (2019, background): “With this perspective, we can say that the variation in our questionnaire arises from the sampling of attributes in the representative domain (Borsboom and Mellenbergh, 2007), which is clear from studies that have examined several different questionnaires (e.g. Christensen et al., 2019; Schwaba et…”
- Using the Attribute Hierarchy Method to Make Diagnostic Inferences about Examinees' Cognitive Skills in Algebra on the SAT. (2008, methodology): “…models are often created and validated by having examinees think aloud as they solve items to identify the information requirements and processing skills elicited by the tasks (Ericsson & Simon, 1993; Leighton, 2004; Leighton & Gierl, 2007b; Royer, Cisero, & Carlo, 1993; Taylor & Dionne, 2000).”