Moral character: A psychological approach.

By A. Blasi. 2005

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ead888e4645410e4e7f0b59b1fd0a7c4e63271c1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Character: The Prospects for a Personality-Based Perspective on Morality (2014, background): “…cognitions, emotions, and motivations that are considered to be relevant to right and wrong according to a relevant moral standard (Allport, 1937; Blasi, 2005; Hogan, 1973).1 Note that the evaluation is not only of what people do behaviorally but also of the morality of their emotions, of…”
The role of moral emotions and individual differences in consumer responses to corporate green and non-green actions (2015, background): “…characteristics has been found to be associated with moral behaviors to varying degrees, including moral reasoning (Kohlberg 1969), moral maturity (Walker and Pitts 1998), moral commitment (Colby and Damon 1992), moral personality (Walker and Frimer 2007), and moral character (Blasi 2005).”
Why Stakeholders Ignore Firm Misconduct (2014, unknown): “Some describe moral motivation as an unconscious urge or need to act to uphold one’s moral standards (Blasi, 2005; Oliner & Oliner, 1988), and others describe it as the result of a deliberative process of moral reasoning (Rest, 1979).”
Beyond Moral Reasoning: A Review of Moral Identity Research and Its Implications for Business Ethics (2008, background): “Blasi (2005) recently expanded on his original ideas regarding the moral self by proposing an augmented model of moral character that proposes three virtues as essential for someone to have a moral identity: willpower, integrity, and moral desire.”
Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review (2006, background): “…central in the actors’ motivational system, and so identified with their core identities, that moral action follows from a kind of spontaneous necessity. . . ” (Blasi, 2005: 84-85). at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 11, 2016jom.sagepub.comDownloaded from Cognitive but nonconscious moral motivation.”
Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. (2014, background): “…common goal, a person of poor character will often turn out to be a fickle ally, since the strength of a person’s character determines how well they will follow through on their plans, goals, commitments, and values (see, e.g., Blasi, 2005; Kupperman, 1991; Piazza, Goodwin, Rozin, & Royzman, 2013).”
Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: the interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. (2009, background): “…variety of individual characteristics have been proposed as determinants of moral behavior, including moral reasoning (Kohlberg, 1969), moral maturity (Walker & Pitts, 1998), moral commitment (Colby & Damon, 1992), moral personality (Walker & Frimer, 2007), and moral character (Blasi, 2005).”