Why Stakeholders Ignore Firm Misconduct
By Michael L. Barnett. 2014
182 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce821dd7cf4dc6613318c1392b7d7912140f1dc3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
- Elena Lvina
- Carol-Ann Tetrault Sirsly
- James Cerruti
- Michael Muyot
- M. Loock
- Michael L. Barnett
- J. Peloza
- Caroline Flammer
In Safety Research
In Sociology and Political Science
- Elena Lvina
- Carol-Ann Tetrault Sirsly
- M. Loock
- Michael L. Barnett
- J. Peloza
- Vilmos F. Misangyi
- Srikanth Paruchuri
Citations in the corpus
- From Doing Good to Looking Even Better: The Dynamics of CSR and Reputation (2019, background): “While M. L. Barnett (2014) has proposed a cognitive process of considerations to determine whether stakeholders will punish firms for bad behavior, a prospective empirical examination poses challenges.”
- Sustainability: How Stakeholder Perceptions Differ from Corporate Reality (2012, background): “However, research suggests that even when stakeholder perceptions of sustainability align with reality, reward or punishment may not materialize due to factors such as the opportunity cost in boycotting a firm with a poor reputation for sustainability.(12)”
- The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility (2018, background): “How do primary stakeholders weigh a firm’s decision to acquiesce to their demands relative to a firm’s proactive effort to take on a social issue? How do stakeholders process conflicting firm actions, such as denying one direct demand but pursuing another social issue? Our lack of understanding of h”