Reducing Uniform Response Bias With Ipsative Measurement in Multiple-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Item Response Modeling of Forced-Choice Questionnaires (2011, background): “Because it is impossible to endorse every item, the forced-choice format eliminates uniform biases such as acquiescence responding (Cheung & Chan, 2002) and can increase operational validity by reducing ‘‘halo’’ effects (Bartram, 2007).”
Perceived competence moderates the relation between performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals (2012, background): “This response pattern is known to inflate correlations among variables (Cheung & Chan, 2002).”
The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A new technique for psychological measurement (2018, methodology): “…or ipsative, method was proposed to reduce response-style biases because in comparisonmethods respondents cannot endorse every item, and consequently may eliminate uniform biases such as acquiescent responding (Cheung & Chan, 2002; Cunningham, Cunningham, & Green, 1977; Greenleaf, 1992).”