Argumentation and education : theoretical foundations and practices
By N. M. Mirza, Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont. 2009
199 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea5bc59c3b06d647b9913bfdd6f1e80b7a16df3d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Christa S. C. Asterhan
- Sandra Gilabert
- Chrysi Rapanta
- Merce Garcia-Mila
- E. Michael Nussbaum
- Deanna Kuhn
Citations in the corpus
- Teacher–Student Dialogue During Classroom Teaching: Does It Really Impact on Student Outcomes? (2019, unknown): “…bringing in the reasons on which opinions are based (e.g., Alexander, 2008; Chinn & Anderson, 1998; Howe & Mercer, 2007; Lefstein, 2010; Mercer & Littleton, 2007; Mortimer & Scott, 2003; Osborne, Erduran, Simon, &Monk, 2001; Reznitskaya & Gregory, 2013; Schwarz, 2009; Wilkinson et al., 2017).”
- What Is Meant by Argumentative Competence? An Integrative Review of Methods of Analysis and Assessment in Education (2013, background): “The first focus refers to the theorized (Baker, 1999) or proven (Asterhan & Schwarz, 2009) relationship between argumentation practice and conceptual change, mainly because through argumentation, meanings are negotiated, solutions are co-constructed, and the epistemic status of the concepts treated…”
- Argumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories (2016, background): “…media, and process support for argumentation—have been studied quite intensively and have each been reviewed elsewhere (Andriessen & Baker, 2015; Andriessen & Schwarz, 2009; Asterhan, 2012; Noroozi, Weinberger, Biemans, Mulder, & Chizari, 2012; Scheuer, Loll, Pinkwart, & McLaren, 2010;…”