How Organizational Resources Affect Strategic Change and Performance in Turbulent Environments

By Matthew S. Kraatz, Edward J. Zajac. 2001

776 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9d2591faa9e6a1e2ebb92b99d2aaf19fe84d7db

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

A Longitudinal Study of Herd Behavior in the Adoption and Continued Use of Technology (2013, neutral): “Kraatz and Zajac 2001 Organizations’ imitations Imitation.”
From Questions to Answers: Reviewing Organizational Learning Research (2004, result): “In contrast, another study found that universities with a high level of resources were slow to adopt new technologies (Kraatz and Zajac, 2001).”
The Relative Value Relevance of Shareholder Versus Stakeholder Corporate Governance Disclosure Policy Reforms in South Africa (2012, neutral): “We follow Kraatz and Zajac (2001) and Guest (2009) in applying the mean-difference approach, which is more robust in the presence of hetereoscedasticity (Wooldridge, 2002; Gujarati, 2003).”
Selection Capability: How Capability Gaps and Internal Social Frictions Affect Internal and External Strategic Renewal (2009, background): “…examine how historical capability endowments affect a firm's propensity to search for new capabilities (Penrose 1959, Cohen and Levinthal 1990, Kraatz and Zajac 2001) and to look inside rather than outside the firm (Pisano 1990, Barney 1999, Rao and Drazin 2002, White 2000, Cuervo- Cazurra…”
A Capabilities Perspective on the Effects of Early Internationalization on Firm Survival and Growth (2006, background): “Other studies have also shown that the ability of organizations to shift resources is important to their responsiveness to environmental pressures (e.g., Kraatz & Zajac, 2001).”
The Essence of Dynamic Capabilities and their Measurement (2018, neutral): “Since theoretical definitions of the constructs within the resource-based view are often all-inclusive and elastic (e.g. Kraatz and Zajac 2001; Priem and Butler 2001; Williamson 1999), operationalizations provide a means for understanding what researchers speciﬁcally mean by dynamic capabilities.”
An Assessment of Resource-Based Theorizing on Firm Growth and Suggestions for the Future (2018, background): “The ability to quickly shift resources allows firms to adapt in rapidly changing environments (Kraatz & Zajac, 2001) and to swiftly pursue emergent opportunities (Sapienza, Autio, George, & Zahra, 2006).”
Less is More, or Not? On the Interplay between Bundles of Slack Resources, Firm Performance and Firm Survival (2015, neutral): “…on ―static efficiency‖ by applying and improving their current resource bundles at the expense of their ―dynamic efficiency‖ from pursuing new strategic options, which is required in high-velocity environments to maintain performance advantages (Ghemawat and Costa, 1993; Kraatz and Zajac, 2001).”