Ethical Climates and the Ethical Dimension of Decision Making

By D. Fritzsche. 2000

239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e994c42870769915905f101b6af7e041fbb80022

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Jennifer J. Kish-Gephart
2. Marie S. Mitchell
3. David A. Harrison
4. Linda Klebe Treviño
5. Donald O. Neubaum
6. Gary R. Rothwell
7. S. Murphy
8. P. Murphy

In Information Systems and Management

1. M. Kaptein
2. Marie S. Mitchell
3. Linda Klebe Treviño
4. Marshall Schminke
5. Jennifer J. Kish-Gephart
6. Rebecca L. Greenbaum
7. David M. Mayer
8. Donald O. Neubaum

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Marie S. Mitchell
2. Marshall Schminke
3. Donald O. Neubaum
4. Maureen L. Ambrose
5. John B. Cullen
6. Kelly D. Martin
7. Jennifer J. Kish-Gephart
8. Gary R. Rothwell

Citations in the corpus

• Ethical Climates and Contextual Predictors of Whistle-Blowing (2006, background): “Higher orders of ethical behavior are expected to increase as one moves from self-interest to concern for universal standards (Barnett & Vaicys, 2000; Fritzsche, 2000).”
• Environmental Influences on Ethical Decision Making: Climate and Environmental Predictors of Research Integrity (2007, background): “Perhaps the most clear-cut conclusion to emerge from studies of ethics is that climate makes a difference with regard to people’s ethical decision making (Forte, 2004; Fritzsche, 2000; Sims & Keon, 1999).”
• Broadening the Fraud Triangle: Instrumental Climate and Fraud (2016, background): “(1997), Fritzsche (2000), Peterson (2002), and Martin and Cullen (2006) with regard to workplace deviance, this finding suggests that an instrumental climate provides an important key to understanding fraud within an organization.”
• Continuities and Extensions of Ethical Climate Theory: A Meta-Analytic Review (2006, background): “This instrument is by and large the most fully developed, widely used, and accepted measure of ethical climate to date (Fritzsche, 2000).”
• Firm Newness, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Ethical Climate (2004, methodology): “Ethical climate was assessed using the 26-item Ethical Climate Questionnaire (ECQ) developed by Victor and Cullen (1988), the most widely used instrument for assessing organizational ethical climate (Cullen et al., 1993; Fritzsche, 2000; Peterson, 2002).”
• Deviant Workplace Behavior and the Organization's Ethical Climate (2002, background): “Several studies have demonstrated that the ethical climate of an organization significantly influences the ethical behavior of the employees (Deshpande, George, & Joseph, 2000; Fritzsche, 2000; Trevino, Butterfield, & McCabe, 1998).”
• Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. (2010, background): “*Fritzsche, D. J. (2000). Ethical climates and the ethical dimension of”