Conducting research interviews

By Jennifer E. Rowley. 2012

1,079 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e962e920d3f8a1c24cb745a867fb310f23f01b1f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Psychological factors influencing technology adoption: A case study from the oil and gas industry (2021, background): “Interviews provide self-reported data and can be subject to bias, as well as motivational agendas (Rowley, 2012).”
Telephonic qualitative research interviews: when to consider them and how to do them (2017, methodology): “Traditionalists argue that facial expressions and body language are an integral part of the communication process (Gillham, 2005; Kvale and Brinkmann, 2008; Rowley, 2012).”
CHE Principles: facilitating authentic and dialogical semi-structured interviews in educational research (2017, unknown): “Interviews occupy a central position in historical and contemporary research methods (Kvale and Brinkmann 2009; Rowley 2012; Seidman 2013), including in educational research (Brenner 2006; Luft et al. 2011).”
Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews (2016, background): “As mentioned above, a great advantage of using Skype as a qualitative research tool is that it allows researchers to transcend geographical boundaries, by nullifying distances and eliminating the need 'to visit an agreed location for interview' (Rowley 2012: 264).”
A Phase Model of Intergenerational Learning in Organizations (2017, background): “The goal of this step was to see whether the grouped first-order statements fit theoretical concepts, or whether new themes might have emerged that had not been considered in previous work (see also, Rowley, 2012).”
Episodic Narrative Interview: Capturing Stories of Experience With a Methods Fusion (2019, background): “Careful planning, literal wording, and logical sequencing of interview questions are further advocated as a means to avoid confusion and ensure clarity among participants (Doody & Noonan, 2013; Rowley, 2012).”