On the 'Organizational Identity' Metaphor

By J. Cornelissen. 2002

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e90c63e2c5eb49a1772ca83d581abae041cc44f2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. S. Cartwright
2. Andrew D. Brown
3. Hongwei He
4. N. Ellemers

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. N. Ellemers
2. Hongwei He
3. S. A. Haslam
4. S. Cartwright
5. S. Gilliland
6. Andrew D. Brown
7. Blake E. Ashforth
8. Rolf van Dick

Citations in the corpus

• Organizational Identity and Organizational Identification (2013, background): “Debates regarding the status of the OI concept as construct (Haslam et al., 2003; Whetten, 2006), the answer to self-referential questions (Brown & Humphreys, 2006), or metaphor (Cornelissen, 2002a, 2002b) will continue to influence the theory and practice of OI research.”
• SOCIAL IDENTITY IN INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY: CONCEPTS, CONTROVERSIES AND CONTRIBUTIONS (2006, background): “…the psychology of this difference, the construct of organizational identity can be seen to be valuable precisely because it allows researchers to resolve the problem identified by Cornelissen (2002a) concerning the impasse between individual and collective levels of analysis (Turner & Oakes, 1986).”