The Multinational Corporation and Global Governance: Modelling Global Public Policy Networks

By David Detomasi. 2007

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e880eb1bc729a11dfbfcf1983ca899dab5a16b0b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. V. Soundararajan
2. Justin Tan
3. Dirk Matten
4. Jill A. Brown
5. Liang Wang
6. Gregory Jackson
7. Stephen Brammer
8. T. Karagiorgos

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Dirk Matten
2. Gregory Jackson
3. V. Soundararajan
4. Justin Tan
5. Jill A. Brown
6. Liang Wang
7. Stephen Brammer
8. Dima Jamali

In Strategy and Management

1. Liang Wang
2. Dirk Matten
3. V. Soundararajan
4. Justin Tan
5. Jill A. Brown
6. Gregory Jackson
7. Stephen Brammer
8. Dima Jamali

Citations in the corpus

• Seeking Legitimacy Through CSR: Institutional Pressures and Corporate Responses of Multinationals in Sri Lanka (2015, unknown): “does not do in terms of CSR activity has competitive and political implications (Detomasi 2007).”
• Voluntary Governance Mechanisms in Global Supply Chains: Beyond CSR to a Stakeholder Utility Perspective (2016, background): “Key product and process parameters can be set by buyers (as in buyerdriven chains), producers (as in producer-driven chains) or agents external to the chain such as government agencies, international organizations and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) (Detomasi, 2007; Gereffi et al., 2001; Kapli”
• The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility: drivers and responses (2008, unknown): “Looking at the political agenda, the increasing profile of CSR as a concept in government action is linked to other challenges brought about by globalization and economic change in the late 20th century (Aaronson & Reeves 2002b, Fox et al. 2002), such as the debate on corporate citizenship, the chan”
• Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional Theory: New Perspectives on Private Governance (2012, background): “‘public domain’ (Ruggie, 2004) with ‘global public policy networks’ (Detomasi, 2007) is arguably one of the most powerful sources of isomorphic pressure to institutionalize CSR in business.”
• MNC Strategic Responses to Ethical Pressure: An Institutional Logic Perspective (2011, background): “A global governance structure (Detomasi, 2007) is certainly needed to build a universal code of conducts (De George, 1993), but the task is beyond the capabilities of any single MNC.”
• Firm Internationalization and Corporate Social Responsibility (2014, unknown): “Industry fixed effects based on the Fama and French (1997) industry classification and year effects are not reported to save space.”