Can businesses move beyond efficiency? The shift toward effectiveness and equity in the corporate sustainability debate

By W. Young, Fiona Tilley. 2006

430 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e84c10cb411060f142d77a56b4b505cf21608cab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Development of Sustainable Entrepreneurship Research Field (2018, background): “Authors such as [28] defined sustainable entrepreneurship as "the sum of all the elements of sustainable development, not only some of them" or simply as "a distinct approach to balancing the triple bottom line requirements".”
Deconstructing the Way in which Value Is Created in the Context of Social Entrepreneurship (2018, positive): “A good reputation, socio-effectiveness, ecoeffectiveness, sufficiency and ecological equity are diverse components of non-financial performance that may increase financial performance in the long term (Parrish 2010; Young and Tilley 2006).”
Beyond the Bounded Instrumentality in Current Corporate Sustainability Research: Toward an Inclusive Notion of Profitability (2011, background): “Environmental and social concerns (Aguilera et al. 2007; Kallio and Nordberg 2006) or a natural or societal case for corporate sustainability (Dyllick and Hockerts 2002; Young and Tilley 2006 ), i.e.”
Strategic cost management and performance : the case of environmental costs (2016, background): “More globally, this result supports the eco-efficiency view (Adams & Ghaly, 2006; Dyllick & Hockerts, 2002; Huppes & Ishikawa, 2005; Young & Tilley, 2006) and the general conclusions from this emerging stream of research in accounting (e.g., Al-Tuwaijri et al., 2004; Burnett & Hansen, 2008; Wisner…”
Recognizing Opportunities for Sustainable Development (2011, background): “…consistent with our definition of sustainable development opportunities, we focus on gains for those other than the entrepreneur because these (perhaps additional) gains distinguish sustainable development from purely economic opportunities (Cohen, Smith, & Mitchell, 2008; Young & Tilley, 2006).”
A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches (2016, background): “This is despite wide recognition that ‘sound’ policies should meet three criteria: (i) effectiveness, (ii) efficiency and (iii) equity (e.g. Young and Tilley 2006).”
Sustainable Development and Business Models of Entrepreneurs in the Organic Food Industry (2015, methodology): “The data were triangulated by a variety of means (Eisenhardt, 1989; Strauss and Corbin, 1998; Yin, 2009).”
Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues (2017, background): “Eco-efficiency is in this sense limited to a ‘depletive’ kind of thinking, rather than ‘sustaining, restorative and regenerative’ solutions (Young and Tilley, 2006, p. 403e404).”
Social Accounting Research as If The World Matters (2009, background): “…actively with their creation offers considerable promise (see, for example, Spreckley 1997; Capron and Gray 2000; Quarter et al. 2003; Pestoff 2004; Young and Tilley 2006).35 Beyond this lies the even more tantalizing prospect of seeking the transformation of conventional organizations to ‘new…”