Mean And Covariance Structures Analyses: An Examination Of The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Among Adolescents And Adults

By Leanne Whiteside-Mansell, Robert F Corwyn. 2003

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e77ca6d99e99dbba209ec8873f853b332b8cee79

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

On Chi-Square Difference and z Tests in Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis when the Base Model is Misspecified (2004, methodology): “In the context of mean structures, rather than using a chi-square statistic to evaluate the overall model, researchers often use z tests to evaluate the statistical significance of mean parameter estimates (see Hong, Malik, & Lee, 2003; Whiteside-Mansell & Corwyn, 2003).”
Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. (2005, background): “In addition, the RSES displays a transparent one-dimensional factor structure (Corwyn, 2000; Fleming & Courtney, 1984; O’Brien, 1985; Whiteside-Mansell & Corwyn, 2003), though some studies have found underlying subfactors within the RSES (Carmines & Zeller, 1979; Tafarodi & Swann, 1996).”
The Construct and Measurement of Peace of Mind (2013, background): “CES-D Center for Epidemiological Study-Depression Scale, STAI-state State Trait Anxiety Inventory-state subscale, Sig. of FChange significance of FChange 1999; Little 1997; Vandenberg 2002; Whiteside-Mansell and Corwyn 2003).”
Comparing self-esteem and perceived control as predictors of first-year college students’ academic achievement (2007, methodology): “Self-esteem. To account for a potential method effect resulting from including positively and negatively worded items, we estimated the covariances between error terms for each of the positively and negatively worded items, a procedure which is consistent with previous CFAs on the RSES (Ross & Broh,”
Testing the Dimensionality of Place Attachment in Recreational Settings (2005, background): “Just as the reliability of a measure’s scores can vary depending on the sample, an instrument can have a different structure (i.e., measure different constructs) in every sample (Whiteside-Mansell & Corwyn, 2003).”