Early Identification of Behavioral and Emotional Problems in Youth: Universal Screening versus Teacher-Referral Identification

By Katie Eklund, Tyler L. Renshaw, Erin Dowdy, S. Jimerson, Shelley R. Hart, Camille N. Jones, J. Earhart. 2009

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7549b43580c537f46becf2ecc47284833383228

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. R. Kamphaus
2. Katie Eklund
3. Erin Dowdy
4. Susan Antaramian

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. R. Kamphaus
2. Angela Grimm
3. P. Schulz

In Education

1. R. Kamphaus
2. Angela Grimm
3. P. Schulz

Citations in the corpus

• A Comparison of Teacher Nomination and Screening to Identify Behavioral and Emotional Risk Within a Sample of Underrepresented Students (2013, background): “There is some evidence suggesting that these brief teacher rating scales do structure teachers’ qualitative perceptions in effective ways that increase screening accuracy beyond that of the standard teacher referral or nomination process; in addition, more students may be identified when using more ”
• Universal Screening for Behavioral and Emotional Risk: A Promising Method for Reducing Disproportionate Placement in Special Education (2012, background): “Waiting for teacher referral often, unfortunately, results in substantial manifestation of behavioral and emotional problems before intervention services are rendered (Eklund et al., 2009; Feil & Walker, 1995).”