Epidemiological studies in the Upernavik district, Greenland. Incidence of some chronic diseases 1950-1974.
By N. Kromann, A. Green. Acta Medica Scandinavica, 2009
1,070 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Pathology and Forensic Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6b655557e23fa71641b129ec515f2da65d21e8d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
In Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
In Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- Accumulated Evidence on Fish Consumption and Coronary Heart Disease Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies (2004, methodology): “We conducted subgroup analyses to examine potential sources of heterogeneity according to: (1) gender; (2) years of follow-up; and (3) methods of dietary assessment (self-administered FFQ versus in-person interview).”
- National Lipid Association Recommendations for Patient-Centered Management of Dyslipidemia: Part 2. (2015, background): “The history of the marine-derived omega-3 fatty acids dates back to the first studies conducted with Greenland Eskimos that reported that a low death rate from CHD was associated with a very high intake of seafood (around 400 g/day).(124,125) Recommendations for EPA and DHA are based on epidemiologi”
- An Increase in the Omega-6/Omega-3 Fatty Acid Ratio Increases the Risk for Obesity (2016, background): “In fact, regular consumption of diets rich in omega-3 PUFAs have been associated with low incidence of these diseases, particularly in Icelandic populations, Inuit indigenous people, and Native Americans in Alaska [7–9].”
- The Omega-3 Index: a new risk factor for death from coronary heart disease? (2004, methodology): “Consistency of epidemiological data Between populations—Yes [30,46,47] Within populations—Yes [9,48] Prospective cohorts—Yes [5,6,20,21,49–56] Strong association between biomarker and disease—Yes [5] Independence from other known risk factors—Yes [5,9] Biological plausibility—Yes [23] Modifiable (Sa”