Language Proficiency in Native and Nonnative Speakers: An Agenda for Research and Suggestions for Second-Language Assessment

By J. Hulstijn. 2011

264 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6438a3254054153809fedcf3a1915832c1c16ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. J. Hulstijn

In Language and Linguistics

1. J. Hulstijn
2. B. Laufer
3. E. Peters
4. Di Zou
5. Bella Rozovski-Roitblat
6. Parveneh Tavakoli
7. Johannes Eckerth
8. Peter Robinson

Citations in the corpus

• ASSESSING SECOND-LANGUAGE ORAL PROFICIENCY FOR RESEARCH (2016, unknown): “Hulstijn ( 2011 , 2012 ) has recently proposed an alternative conceptualization, stating that language profi ciency “should be taken seriously . . . because it is fundamental in the understanding of language acquisition and bilingualism” (2012, p. 429).”
• The construct of language proficiency in the study of bilingualism from a cognitive perspective* (2012, background): “In Hulstijn (2011), it is argued that the six levels of the CEFR fail to consistently distinguish between language development and language proficiency.”