Production Regimes and the Quality of Employment in Europe

By D. Gallie. 2007

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e48178311fb3e9b3139694d03559a907edd8aefa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Karen M. Olsen
2. I. Esser
3. F. Green
4. A. Kalleberg
5. Torstein Nesheim
6. D. Raffe
7. David Holman
8. M. Yaish

In Political Science and International Relations

1. F. Green
2. A. Kalleberg
3. Torstein Nesheim
4. I. Esser
5. D. Raffe
6. Karen M. Olsen
7. H. Stier
8. M. Yaish

In Public Administration

1. F. Green
2. A. Kalleberg
3. Torstein Nesheim
4. I. Esser
5. D. Raffe
6. Karen M. Olsen

Citations in the corpus

• Is Job Quality Becoming More Unequal? (2013, background): “…theories these ideas should apply to all CMEs, but in contrast, the employment regime framework (sometimes referred to as the Power resources model) differentiates within the CMEs between social corporatist (also termed “inclusive”) and dualist regimes (Gallie 2007a, 2007b; Olsen et al. 2010).”
• The concept of transition system (2008, background): “Similar issues are experienced in other fields of comparative research, such as that on production regimes (Gallie 2007).”
• Perceived job quality in the United States, Great Britain, Norway and West Germany, 1989-2005 (2010, methodology): “PR assumes a more differentiated clustering of countries than VoC, distinguishing social-democratic, liberal and corporatist welfare states (Esping-Andersen, 1990), or inclusive, dual and liberal employment regimes (Gallie, 2007c).”
• E Pluribus Unum? Varieties and Commonalities of Capitalism (2010, unknown): “Reviewing that debate, Gallie (2007) concludes that power resource theory trumps VoC in accounting for different patterns of labor market regulation and, in particular, of constraints on employers.”
• Perceived Job Quality: Autonomy and Job Security within a Multi-Level Framework (2012, result): “This supports previous findings and arguments showing that higher levels of autonomy and opportunities for participation can be linked to the strength of unions (Gallie, 2007b).”
• Job quality in Europe (2008, unknown): “This is problematic, because it extends the concept of job quality far beyond the specific qualities of the job and the relationship between the job and its holder (Meager and Sinclair, 2004). By contrast, Tilly (1997) adopts a more focused approach using seven measures of job quality: wages, fringe”
• Subjective employment insecurity around the world (2009, background): “Women are then disproportionately concentrated in occupational labour markets ( Gallie, 2007a, 2007b; Estevez-Abe, 2005).”