The building blocks of experience: an early framework for interaction designers

By Jodi L. Forlizzi, Shannon Ford. Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, 2000

556 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Mechanical Engineering, Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e424813816e8f4945225aaaee2fca2586bb2de3a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Mechanical Engineering

In Social Psychology

In Human-Computer Interaction

Citations in the corpus

Experience, Emotion, and Eudaimonia: A Consideration of Tourist Experiences and Well-being (2017, background): “Through narratives, people communicate and make sense of their experiences and attach meanings and personal relevance to them (Forlizzi and Ford 2000).”
Designing electronic collaborative learning environments (2004, background): “In addition, it lacks a thorough theoretical framework, although researchers are trying to propose one (e.g., Forlizzi & Ford, 2000).”
Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges: a critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience (2011, background): “A substantial body of research has analyzed the nature of this experience (e.g., [12, 13]).”
Customer experience modeling: from customer experience to service design (2012, background): “Instead, we only design situations that better support customers in co-creating their desired experiences (Forlizzi and Ford, 2000).”
Co-experience: user experience as interaction (2005, methodology): “In this paper, we have introduced the notion of co-experience and present it as an elaboration of Forlizzi and Ford’s (2000) model of user experience in interaction.”
Understanding experience in interactive systems (2004, background): “It builds on the interaction-centered model presented in [22] as well as studies on collaborative aspects of user experience [4].”
Empathy and experience in HCI (2008, methodology): “The pragmatist approach to experience, articulated with different emphases by Forlizzi and Ford [25], Forlizzi and Battarbee [24], and McCarthy and Wright [37], because of its methodological openness, may help frame this discussion of knowing the user in the context of experience design.”
Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach (2009, background): “Third, the landscape of UX research is fragmented and complicated by diverse theoretical models with different foci such as pragmatism, emotion, affect, experience, value, pleasure, beauty, hedonic quality, etc. (e.g. [2] [3] [4] [5] [12] [17] [21]).”