When Market Information Constitutes Fields: Sensemaking of Markets in the Commercial Music Industry

By N. Anand, R. Peterson. 2000

345 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Music, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3422b8c3ff8b7e28239564d3a078aea86608c27

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Music

1. T. Dowd

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Marlys K. Christianson
2. Paul W. L. Vlaar
3. Benedict Kemmerer
4. T. Dowd
5. Luciana D'Adderio
6. F. V. D. van den Bosch
7. Henk W. Volberda
8. V. Narayanan

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Benedict Kemmerer
2. T. Dowd
3. Luciana D'Adderio
4. Neil Pollock
5. Henk W. Volberda
6. James G. Webster
7. V. Narayanan
8. Marlys K. Christianson

Citations in the corpus

• Cultural Industries: Product–Market Characteristics, Management Challenges and Industry Dynamics (2015, neutral): “This encouraged increasing fragmentation in terms of styles offered within the sector (Anand and Peterson 2000; McCourt and Rothenbuhler 1997).”
• Concentration and Diversity Revisited: Production Logics and the U.S. Mainstream Recording Market, 1940-1990 (2004, background): “Still, the mainstream has remained a distinct market in terms of its broadly appealing music and its high volume and sales (see Anand & Peterson 2000; Dowd 2000, 2003; Dowd & Blyler 2002; Ennis 1992; Lopes 1992).”
• Give me a two-by-two matrix and I will create the market: Rankings, graphic visualisations and sociomateriality (2012, background): “Since jukeboxes held 40 single records this apparently led to the development of ‘op 40’ record programmes on radio stations (see also Anand and Peterson 2000).”
• Coping with Problems of Understanding in Interorganizational Relationships: Using Formalization as a Means to Make Sense (2006, background): “It also conditions sensemaking by limiting the information and cues on which participants focus their attention (Anand and Peterson 2000; Daft and Weick 1984).”
• The Dynamics of Audience Fragmentation: Public Attention in an Age of Digital Media (2012, background): “Indeed, information regimes can themselves promote or mitigate processes of audience fragmentation (e.g., Anand & Peterson, 2000; Barnes & Thomson, 1994; Napoli, 2011).”
• Sensemaking in Organizations: Taking Stock and Moving Forward (2014, background): “For example, Anand and Peterson (2000) and Anand and Watson (2004) have shown how fields evolve and markets are enacted when groups of actors participate in activities that create certain sets of meaning.”
• The Cognitive Perspective in Strategy: An Integrative Review (2011, background): “It represents organization members’ collective understanding of the features presumed to be central and relatively permanent—features that distinguish the organization from other organizations (Albert & Whetten, 1985).”