The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership

By N. Paulley, R. Balcombe, R. Mackett, Helena Titheridge, John Preston, M. Wardman, J. Shires, P. White. 2006

747 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2cd980c318a9c78d8fb68b6d396f45abd5ec349

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Cynthia Chen
2. D. Varley
3. Jason Li Chen
4. T. Litman
5. G. Santos
6. Thomas Brunn
7. Dimitris Potoglou
8. Hanna Maoh

In Transportation

1. Cynthia Chen
2. D. Varley
3. Jason Li Chen
4. T. Litman
5. G. Santos
6. Thomas Brunn
7. Dimitris Potoglou
8. Hanna Maoh

Citations in the corpus

• Factors influencing modal split of commuting journeys in medium-size European cities (2013, background): “The share of public transport (T SHARE) increases with population size, in line Schwanen (2002) and Susilo and Maat (2007) and decreases with the cost of a monthly ticket (TRANSIT FARE), in line with Balcombe et al. (2004), Cervero (1998), Chen et al. (2008), Paulley et al (2006) and Zhang (2004).”
• What Affects Transit Ridership? A Dynamic Analysis involving Multiple Factors, Lags and Asymmetric Behaviour (2011, background): “Paulley et al. (2006) reviewed a number of studies examining the various factors affecting the demand for transit in Britain.”
• Reconfiguring Urban Sustainability Transitions, Analysing Multiplicity (2017, background): “That is not to say that there is not a key role for non-local interests—there is, as the role of the UK state in bus deregulation and liberalisation in the 1980s illustrates [57,58], for example, and in producing a fragmented cycling system [59]—but it does demonstrate a level of correspondence betw”
• Tourism and urban public transport: Holding demand pressure under supply constraints (2010, neutral): “On the other hand, private motorization and the average price of public transport have a statistically significant but negative impact on transport demand, which is a result consistent to recent empirical works on local transport demand (Dargay & Hanly, 2002; Matas, 2004; Paulley et al., 2006).”
• Transit Price Elasticities and Cross-Elasticities (2004, background): “Many studies have been performed on the price elasticity of public transit, and several previous publications have summarized the results of such studies, including Pham and Linsalata (1991); Oum, Waters, and Yong (1992); Goodwin (1992); Luk and Hepburn (1993); Pratt (1999); Dargay and Hanly (1999),”
• Should Urban Transit Subsidies Be Reduced (2009, result): “studies by Paulley et al. (2006) produces somewhat larger long-run elasticities, which they suggest is because elasticities have risen in magnitude and are higher in the United Kingdom than in other nations.”