Transit Price Elasticities and Cross-Elasticities

By T. Litman. 2004

384 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0113972a7881d04bfd4364b5c3d3568e2af41176

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Oded Cats
2. Yusak O. Susilo
3. Triin Reimal
4. Cynthia Chen
5. D. Varley
6. Jason Li Chen
7. T. Litman

In Transportation

1. Oded Cats
2. Yusak O. Susilo
3. Triin Reimal
4. Cynthia Chen
5. D. Varley
6. Jason Li Chen
7. T. Litman
8. M. Carmona

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding Transport Demands and Elasticities: How Prices and Other Factors Affect Travel Behavior (2012, background): “Todd Litman (2004), “Transit Price Elasticities and Cross-Elasticities,” Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 7, No. 2, (www.nctr.usf.edu), pp. 37-58; at www.vtpi.org/tranelas.pdf.”
• The prospects of fare-free public transport: evidence from Tallinn (2017, methodology): “Disincentives for car usage such as congestion pricing, parking fees and fuel prices might result with a greater model shift from car to public transport than those gains by reducing public transport fares (Cervero 1990; Litman 2012). Depending on the extent to which the cross-elasticity dominates t”
• Evaluating Public Transit Benefits and Costs: Best Practices Guidebook (2004, background): “4%, although this varies depending on various geographic, demographic and service factors (Hensher and King 1998; Pratt 1999; TRL 2004; Litman 2004).”
• Psychological effects of and design preferences for real-time information displays (2006, neutral): “A negative sign indicates that the effect operates in the opposite direction from the cause (Victoria Transport Policy Institute 2005; Litman 2004).”
• Evaluating Public Transit Benefits and Costs (2015, background): “Cambridge Systematics and Apogee Research (1996), Measuring and Valuing Transit Benefits and Disbenefits, TCRP Report 20, Transportation Research Board, (www.trb.org).”
• Valuing Transit Service Quality Improvements (2008, background): “Dis-cretionary transit users (people who have the option of driving) tend to be partic-Valuing ularly sensitive to comfort and convenience improvements (Phillips, Karachepone, and Landis 2001; Litman 2004; DfT 2006).”
• What Affects Transit Ridership? A Dynamic Analysis involving Multiple Factors, Lags and Asymmetric Behaviour (2011, background): “90 (McLeod et al., 1991; Litman, 2004), with the higher values representing long-term elasticties and the lower values being short-term elasticities.”