Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy

By Florian Cova, Brent Strickland, A. Abatista, Aurélien Allard, James Andow, Mario Attie, James R. Beebe, Renatas Berniūnas, Jordane Boudesseul, M. Colombo and 32 more. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2018

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab3ebf63475680828c6a111a14eec99d6788bb35

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Nicole C. Krämer
2. Sonja Utz
3. René Weber
4. Frank M. Schneider
5. Farid Anvari
6. Daniël Lakens
7. Marielle Stel

In General Decision Sciences

1. Daniël Lakens

In Safety Research

1. Neil A. Lewis
2. Benjamin K. Johnson
3. Nicholas David Bowman
4. Sonja Utz
5. Claes H. de Vreese

Citations in the corpus

• An Agenda for Open Science in Communication (2020, background): “Replication rates in these projects vary considerably, ranging from 36% in cognitive and social psychology (Open Science Collaboration, 2015) to 78% in experimental philosophy (Cova et al., 2018).”
• The Replicability Crisis and Public Trust in Psychological Science (2018, background): “And, in experimental philosophy, approximately 30% of 40 original findings failed to replicate (Cova et al., 2018).”