The development of L2 interactional competence: evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization

By S. P. Doehler, Evelyne Pochon-Berger. 2015

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e09b66b20db8da221c60398b07c7bed1f411794a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Daniel M. K. Lam
2. G. Kasper
3. Carsten Roever
4. John Hellermann

In Language and Linguistics

1. Carsten Roever
2. Daniel M. K. Lam
3. G. Kasper
4. Naoko Taguchi
5. Numa Markee
6. J. C. Félix-Brasdefer
7. Sharyl Tanck
8. John Hellermann

Citations in the corpus

• What counts as “responding”? Contingency on previous speaker contribution as a feature of interactional competence (2018, background): “In a review of CA literature on L2 IC, Pekarek Doehler and Pochon-Berger (2015) synthesize the observations of IC development in L2 learners as involving the diversification of techniques/methods for interaction, increased efficiency in recipient-designing one’s talk to fit the here-and-now of the i”
• Speaking in turns and sequences: Interactional competence as a target construct in testing speaking (2018, background): “In a recent survey article synthesizing studies across target languages (English, French, German, Swedish, and Arabic) and settings (classroom talk, elicited conversation, role play, and casual talk), Pekarek Doehler and Pochon-Berger (2015) review the evidence of how L2 speakers’ use of the fundame”