Factor Analysis in Counseling Psychology Research, Training, and Practice
By Jeffrey H. Kahn. 2006
764 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e02c799e3fc5c2fc64292f116d872cc4bc9ed285
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Marylène Gagné
- Dawn M. Szymanski
- Robert J. Vallerand
- Ryan D. Duffy
- Bonnie Moradi
- Richard M. Ryan
- Alexandre J. S. Morin
- Jacques Forest
In Computer Networks and Communications
- R. Henson
- S. Quintana
- T. Minami
- Dawn M. Szymanski
- R. Haase
- Marylène Gagné
- David Litalien
- Joshua C. Watson
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Dawn M. Szymanski
- Bonnie Moradi
- Matthew A. Diemer
- R. Henson
- S. Quintana
- T. Minami
- C. DeBlaere
- Alexandre J. S. Morin
Citations in the corpus
- Individual Differences in Emotion Expression: Hierarchical Structure and Relations with Psychological Distress (2008, neutral): “PAF analyzes the common variance among variables, and it is preferable to principal components analysis when the goal is to find common factors (Kahn, 2006).”
- The Hull Method for Selecting the Number of Common Factors (2011, methodology): “In empirical practice, it is generally advised to use an objective procedure combined with reasoned reflection (see, e.g., Henson & Roberts, 2006; Kahn, 2006).”
- Guidelines for Meta-Analyses of Counseling Psychology Research (2006, background): “…meta-analyses do not count votes of significance but instead focus on effect sizes and confidence intervals (CIs) for the effect size (for more on CIs, see Kahn, 2006 [TCP, special issue, part 1]; Weston & Gore, 2006 [TCP, special issue, part 1]; Worthington & Whittaker, 2006 [this issue]).”
- Young Adult Women’s Reports of Their Male Romantic Partner’s Pornography Use as a Correlate of Their Self-Esteem, Relationship Quality, and Sexual Satisfaction (2012, methodology): “91, which indicates that the sample size was large enough to evaluate the factor structure (Kahn 2006).”
- Psychological, Relational, and Sexual Correlates of Pornography Use on Young Adult Heterosexual Men in Romantic Relationships (2014, methodology): “001), which indicates that the data was appropriate for factor analysis (Kahn, 2006).”
- Advanced Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Counseling Psychology Research (2006, methodology): “Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a data-analytic technique increasing in popularity during the past several years (Martens, 2005; Steiger, 2001; Weston & Gore, 2006 [TCP, special issue, part 1]; for other techniques in this special issue, see Helms, Henze, Sass, & Mifsud, 2006 [TCP, special iss”
- A revised learning transfer system inventory: factorial replication and validation (2012, background): “For this reason, large sample sizes are necessary for proper estimation in CFA (Kahn 2006).”
- Instagram Use and Self-Objectification: The Roles of Internalization, Comparison, Appearance Commentary, and Feminism (2018, methodology): “15 difference from an items’ highest factor loading (Kahn, 2006; Tabachnick & Fidell, 2013; Worthington & Whittaker, 2006).”
- Development and Validation of the Calling and Vocation Questionnaire (CVQ) and Brief Calling Scale (BCS) (2012, methodology): “Anticipating that factors would be intercorrelated, we subjected the correlation matrix for the 156 items to a principle axis factoring (PAF) analysis with oblique, promax rotation (see Kahn, 2006; Steger, 2006; Worthington & Whittaker, 2006).”
- The construction and initial validation of the Work Volition Scale (2012, background): “Items were removed if they did not form a distinct factor of at least 3 items (Kahn, 2006).”
- Discriminant Analysis in Counseling Psychology Research (2006, methodology): “A function in DDA is analogous to a factor in factor analysis and is essentially the synthetic variable created by linearly combining the discriminating variables of interest (N, E, O, A, and C; for more on factor analysis, see Kahn, 2006 [this issue]).”
- Construct Validation in Counseling Psychology Research (2006, methodology): “In an initial factor-analytic investigation with the CCCI-R, LaFromboise et al. (1991) failed to find three distinct factors, despite the fact that items were drawn from three separate but related content domains.”
- Conducting Research With LGB People of Color: Methodological Challenges and Strategies (2010, background): “Structural equation modeling (SEM), in particular, has received much attention in the counseling psychology literature (e.g., Kahn, 2006; Martens, 2005; Weston & Gore, 2006).”