Discriminant Analysis in Counseling Psychology Research
By Alissa R. Sherry. 2006
128 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3bb6be9daa4d0f77972900a6dcadd8a15e5b547a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- R. Henson
- Rosalia E. Warbasse
- Erica Y. Chu
- William T. Hoyt
- J. Helms
- T. Sass
- Venus Mifsud
- Kevin T Henze
In Management Science and Operations Research
- R. Henson
- Rosalia E. Warbasse
- Erica Y. Chu
- William T. Hoyt
- J. Helms
- T. Sass
- Venus Mifsud
- Kevin T Henze
In Social Psychology
- S. Quintana
- Jeffrey H. Kahn
- T. Minami
- Shaljan Areepattamannil
- Rosalia E. Warbasse
- T. Sass
- Erica Y. Chu
- Venus Mifsud
Citations in the corpus
- Segmenting socially responsible mutual fund investors (2009, methodology): “001 and can thus be included in further analysis (Sherry, 2006).”
- A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (2006, unknown): “…among these variables might differ across levels of employment prestige, Long (1998) compared the model’s performance in two groups of employed women: a group of managers and a group of clerical workers (on testing multiple groups with discriminant analysis, see Sherry, 2006 [this issue]).”
- Guidelines for Meta-Analyses of Counseling Psychology Research (2006, methodology): “The classical meta-analysis is Smith and Glass’s (1977) review of psychotherapy research in response to Eysenck’s (1952) doubts about psychotherapy’s efficacy.”
- Effect-Size Measures and Meta-Analytic Thinking in Counseling Psychology Research (2006, methodology): “26), citing the now somewhat dated Super (1949). Finally, Figure 3 illustrates d = .”
- Advanced Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Counseling Psychology Research (2006, unknown): “…this special issue, see Helms, Henze, Sass, & Mifsud, 2006 [TCP, special issue, part 1]; Henson, 2006 [TCP, special issue, part 1]; Kahn, 2006 [TCP, special issue, part 1]; Quintana & Minami, 2006 [this issue]; Sherry, 2006 [TCP, special issue, part 1]; Worthington & Whittaker, 2006 [this issue]).”
- Treating Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficients as Data in Counseling Research (2006, background): “…(i.e., assumptions about data characteristics) underlie the researcher’s choice of appropriate statistical analyses for his or her overall study (see Sherry, 2006 [this issue], for more on choosing the appropriate statistical analysis), measurement models also should underlie the researcher’s…”
- Academic Achievement, Academic Self-Concept, and Academic Motivation of Immigrant Adolescents in the Greater Toronto Area Secondary Schools (2008, methodology): “analysis (DDA) in lieu of multivariate analysis of variance because DDA is sufficient to indicate both that group differences exist and precisely where they exist among the variables (Sherry, 2006).”
- Factor Analysis in Counseling Psychology Research, Training, and Practice (2006, methodology): “Alternatively, pattern coefficients are unique weights given to each factor in explaining an individual’s score on a variable, which are similar to weights in multiple regression or discriminant analysis (see Sherry, 2006 [this issue].”
- Construct Validation in Counseling Psychology Research (2006, background): “…et al. (2001) provide a useful typology of threats to cultural generalizability and suggestions for adapting both measures and research practices to enhance validity of research on diverse groups (for an alternative method for multigroup comparisons, see Sherry, 2006 [TCP, special issue, part 1]).”