Guidelines for Meta-Analyses of Counseling Psychology Research

By S. Quintana, T. Minami. 2006

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2bdd23e633a0f94afbaadc5f843bc07fb8cab9b0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. (2008, methodology): “In case of significant heterogeneity, randomeffect models were applied.(46,47) To assess the degree of heterogeneity, we calculated the I(2) index.”
Correlates and consequences of internalized stigma for people living with mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2010, methodology): “This approach ensured that ameta-analysis for a particular variable did not includemultiple effect sizes from a single study, which would violate the assumption of independent effect sizes (Quintana & Minami, 2006).”
Spatial Ability: Its Influence on Learning with Visualizations—a Meta-Analytic Review (2010, background): “In comparison to fixed-effects models, random-effects models yield confidence intervals closer to their nominal width (cp., Quintana and Minami 2006 ) and are therefore recommended by a number of authors (e.g., Erez et al. 1996; Hunter and Schmidt 2000).”
Student evaluations of teaching: combining the meta-analyses and demonstrating further evidence for effective use (2012, methodology): “When examining the relationship between variables, the r statistic has been noted as a more general statistic to use (Quintana and Minami 2006), rather than a group difference statistic (e.g. Cohen’s d).”
Racial Discrimination and Asian Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis (2011, background): “As suggested by Quintana and Minami (2006), a systematic coding system was developed—based on the literature review and our research questions—to”
Advanced Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Counseling Psychology Research (2006, unknown): “…this special issue, see Helms, Henze, Sass, & Mifsud, 2006 [TCP, special issue, part 1]; Henson, 2006 [TCP, special issue, part 1]; Kahn, 2006 [TCP, special issue, part 1]; Quintana & Minami, 2006 [this issue]; Sherry, 2006 [TCP, special issue, part 1]; Worthington & Whittaker, 2006 [this issue]).”
A systematic review of studies examining the relationship between reported racism and health and wellbeing for children and young people. (2013, background): “There is also potential for null or negative findings to be under-represented due to publication bias, since researchers and academic journals have traditionally minimised the importance of these findings (Quintana & Minami, 2006).”
Research on religion/spirituality and forgiveness: A meta-analytic review. (2013, methodology): “In our primary analyses, for each sample, we only used one effect size (Quintana & Minami, 2006; Rosenthal, 1994) for each type of forgiveness (i.e., trait, state, self) for each individual sample.”
Racism as a Determinant of Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2015, methodology): “Third, we calculated a fail-safe N to estimate the number of un-located studies with an average zero effect size required to change the results substantively [65].”
Construct Validation in Counseling Psychology Research (2006, background): “…and Hunter (1998) published meta-analytic findings on the incremental validity of 18 categories of personnel measures as predictors of job performance, over and above variance predicted by GMA (for more on meta-analyses in counseling psychology research, see Quintana & Minami, 2006 [this issue]).”
Relationship Between School Suspension and Student Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis (2015, methodology): “These two students coded only aspects of the study unrelated to the actual ES because Quintana and Minami (2006) recommended that coding be done blind to the ESs of the articles.”