Cyberbullying: Predicting Victimisation and Perpetration

By Michel Walrave, Wannes Heirman. 2011

311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0084edac970ca900ec7d8c5db2c71c7b0f4463c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Cyberbullying: A Review of the Literature. (2013, background): “The double-edged nature of modern technology, continuously balancing between risks and opportunities, manifests itself clearly in an emerging societal problem known as cyberbullying (Walrave & Heirman, 2011).”
Cyberbullying in Greek Adolescents: The Role of Parents☆ (2014, background): “…conducted in the USA, the UK and Belgium claim that boys tend towards being cyberbullying aggressors while girls are more likely to be cyberbullying victims (Dehue et al., 2008; Smith, Mahdavi, Carvalho, Fisher, Russell, & Tippett, 2008; Walrave & Heirman, 2011; Wang, Iannotti, & Nansel, 2009).”
Why Do Adults Engage in Cyberbullying on Social Media? An Integration of Online Disinhibition and Deindividuation Effects with the Social Structure and Social Learning Model (2016, methodology): “Focused on the extent of using technology Walrave and Heirman (2011) yes (0.833 ) no self-report cyberbullying no teenagers (mean 15.1) 1318 secondary school pupils in Belgium for their cyberbullying experience 6 Citation ISI rated journal?”
Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy (2013, background): “Research findings have confirmed that there is an interaction between the experience of being a perpetrator of cyberbullying and that of being its victim (Walrave & Heirman, 2011; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2004).”
How stressful is online victimization? Effects of victim's personality and properties of the incident (2012, background): “However, careful information management correlates with less victimization (Staude-Müller et al., 2009; Walrave & Heirman, 2011).”
Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. (2014, background): “Walrave and Heirman (2011) observed that individuals who perpetuate cyberbullying also tend to minimize the impact of their behavior on others.”
Cyberbullying and victimisation among Turkish university students (2011, methodology): “Both nonparametric correlations among each victimisation and bullying item, and the simple regression conducted with the averages, revealed a mutual variance between victimisation and bullying as indicated in the previous literature (Bauman, 2010; Bauman & Pero, 2010; Walrave & Heirman, 2011).”
The relationship between online activities, netiquette and cyberbullying (2014, background): “Cyberbullying can be understood within the context of these online activities (Festl & Quandt, 2013; Walrave & Heirman, 2011; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2008).”
Peer Influence, Internet use and Cyberbullying: A Comparison of Different Context Effects among German Adolescents (2013, background): “The amount of ICT use is regarded as being a catalyst for cyberbullying in the literature (Walrave & Heirman, 2009).”