Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action.
By Nicole Tausch, J. Becker, Russell Spears, Oliver Christ, R. Saab, Purnima Singh, Roomana Siddiqui. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011
677 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1fa8ac2db0de9f5077196b771fc144a89147e6da
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- R. Imhoff
- John T. Jost
- P. Lamberty
- Martin Bruder
- Eran Halperin
- Felicity M. Turner‐Zwinkels
- Maja Kutlaca
- J. Becker
In Sociology and Political Science
- Martijn van Zomeren
- J. Becker
- John T. Jost
- Eran Halperin
- P. Lamberty
- Nicole Tausch
- R. Imhoff
- Winnifred R. Louis
Citations in the corpus
- Contempt: Derogating Others While Keeping Calm (2016, background): “Contempt can also be felt toward the powerful, for example in a protest (Tausch et al., 2011).”
- The “Great Replacement” conspiracy: How the perceived ousting of Whites can evoke violent extremism and Islamophobia (2021, result): “Based on previous studies (e.g., Tausch et al., 2011), one may have expected that the predictive power of perceived replacement would become weaker the more extreme the dependent variables become.”
- Why We Hate (2018, background): “…that positive change in the outgroup’s violent and immoral behavior is possible, then constructive political reactions—like negotiations, compromises, gestures, or even apologies, which are usually meant to establish more friendly relations—seem just irrelevant (see also Tausch et al., 2011).”
- The experience of collective participation: shared identity, relatedness and emotionality (2011, background): “This relates to work within the collective action literature which explores the roles of specific emotions including anger (van Zomeren et al., 2004; Livingstone et al., 2011) and contempt (Tausch et al., 2011) in encouraging participation in collective action.”
- Living under threat: Mutual threat perception drives anti‐Muslim and anti‐Western hostility in the age of terrorism (2018, methodology): “88) adopted from Tausch et al., (2011). Direct experience of Western foreign policy.”
- Group Emotions: Cutting the Gordian Knots Concerning Terms, Levels of Analysis, and Processes (2015, neutral): “…et al. (2013a) X Shepherd, et al. (2013b) X Smith et al. (2007) X Tagar et al. (2011) X Tam et al. (2007) X Tapias et al. (2007) X Tarrant et al. (2009) X Tausch et al. (2011) X Tropp (2003) X Van der Schalk et al. (2011) X Van Leeuwen et al. (2013) X Van Zomeren et al. (2007) X Van Zomeren…”
- A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers (2015, methodology): “(Note that the first assessment uses data described in Study 1 of Tausch et al., 2011).”
- Missing in (Collective) Action (2017, background): “They emphasize three antecedents of protest: (a) anger at perceived injustice, (b) social identification, and (c) beliefs about group efficacy (Drury & Reicher, 2009; Kawakami & Dion, 1995; Tausch et al., 2011; van Zomeren, Leach, & Spears, 2012).”
- Speaking (Un–)Truth to Power: Conspiracy Mentality as A Generalised Political Attitude (2014, background): “Copyright © 2013 European Association of Personality Psychology action (Tausch et al., 2011), we explored whether the same was true in this case.”
- Social interaction and psychological pathways to political engagement and extremism (2014, methodology): “In keeping with previous measurement approaches (Moskalenko & McCauley, 2009; Tausch et al., 2011), five items measured intention to engage in specific (legal) political actions, α= .”
- Integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for: A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (2018, background): “…to include participative efficacy beliefs (Van Zomeren, Saguy, & Schellhaas, 2013), and expanded the notion of group-based anger to include different targets of anger (e.g., at the government or at the system; Van Zomeren et al., in press) and related emotions like contempt (Tausch et al., 2011).”