Social interaction and psychological pathways to political engagement and extremism

By Emma F. Thomas, Craig McGarty, Winnifred R. Louis. 2014

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e1730334d1647c92ad4758e8824380e6cb6a504

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Katarzyna Jaśko
2. Gary LaFree
3. Arie W. Kruglanski
4. J. Drury
5. E. Molinario
6. D. Webber
7. Marina Chernikova
8. John T. Jost

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Sara Vestergren
2. Eva Hammar Chiriac
3. Katarzyna Jaśko
4. Gary LaFree
5. Arie W. Kruglanski
6. J. Drury
7. E. Molinario
8. D. Webber

Citations in the corpus

• Quest for significance and violent extremism : the case of domestic radicalization (2017, background): “In support of this process, a study by Thomas, McGarty, and Louis (2014) has shown that priming extreme political action as a legitimate idea combined with social interaction increased support for such an action.”
• The Making of Violent Extremists (2018, background): “In this vein, Thomas, McGarty, and Louis (2014) found that support for extreme political actions involved an interaction between messaging and social interaction, and that neither factor increased support in isolation.”
• The biographical consequences of protest and activism: a systematic review and a new typology (2017, background): “…& Reicher, 2000, 2005; Drury et al., 2003; Kiecolt, 2000; Klandermans et al., 2008; McAdam, 1989; Van Dyke & Dixon, 2013) and identity (e.g. Barr & Drury, 2009; Blackwood & Louis, 2012; Drury & Reicher, 2000, 2005; Drury et al., 2003; Klar & Kasser, 2009; Stuart et al., 2013; Thomas et al., 2014).”