The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale.

950 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Bioweapon or a Hoax? The Link Between Distinct Conspiracy Beliefs About the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak and Pandemic Behavior (2020, background): “; item order randomized), of SDO (Ho et al., 2015; e.g., “Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups.””
Gender-Inclusive Bathrooms Signal Fairness Across Identity Dimensions (2018, methodology): “76) and the 8-item SDO scale (Ho et al., 2015) as they believed company managers would (a 1⁄4 .”
The Racial and Economic Context of Trump Support (2018, background): “This pattern held while controlling for individual dispositions, such as SDO (Ho et al., 2015; Pratto et al., 2000) and political conservatism (Jost, Glaser, Kruglanski, & Sulloway, 2003), making it unlikely that the link between racial diversity and threat reflects ideological sorting processes (e.”
When and How Subordinate Performance Leads to Abusive Supervision: A Social Dominance Perspective (2018, background): “Finally, since our initial data collection, a new measure of SDO has been published (Ho et al., 2015).”
The Authoritarian Dynamic During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Effects on Nationalism and Anti-Immigrant Sentiment (2020, methodology): “Ho et al. (2015) report good criterion and construct validity; these eight items were combined into a single ranging from 0 to 1 (UK: M ¼ .36, SD ¼ .18, Cronbach’s a ¼ .84; ROI: M ¼ .41, SD ¼ .21, Cronbach’s a ¼ .79).”