The effects of process and outcome accountability on judgment process and performance

By Bart de Langhe, Stijn M. J. van Osselaer, Berend Wierenga. 2011

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de7f55e60e226dbc6e7198c96415e1544f41eebc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Satoris S. Culbertson
2. Pedro I. Leiva
3. Edgar E. Kausel

In General Decision Sciences

1. Satoris S. Culbertson
2. Pedro I. Leiva
3. A. Jackson
4. Edgar E. Kausel
5. J. Slaughter

In Safety Research

1. Satoris S. Culbertson
2. Pedro I. Leiva
3. A. Jackson
4. Edgar E. Kausel
5. J. Slaughter

Citations in the corpus

• Too arrogant for their own good? Why and when narcissists dismiss advice (2015, result): “Several authors have found that, in contrast to process accountability, outcome accountability fails to improve decisions and their consequences (e.g., Brtek & Motowidlo, 2002; Simonson & Staw, 1992; cf. Langhe et al., 2011).”