What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education

By Paul Anderson. 2007

1,281 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd98ddd6aaae03ff0d15e65cadd164e868f4e153

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The appropriation and repurposing of social technologies in higher education (2009, background): “…the emergent modes of communication, meaning-making and community formation enabled by 'Web 2.0' within the university (for example, Alexander 2006; Anderson 2007), but very little formal research that is focused around the application of Web 2.0 technologies in higher education pedagogy has as…”
Analysis of User Satisfaction with Online Education Platforms in China during the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020, background): “Many experts and scholars including Anderson [4] and Sultan [5] etc. from various counties have conducted research on online education with the vigorous development of the online education industry.”
Digital Literacy: A Review of Literature (2020, background): “According to (Nashipudi, 2012; Anderson, 2007) the key features of Web 2.0 include: 1.”
The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual) - A literature review (2013, background): “…of social media in general and the saturation of SNSs in particular, many higher education instructors have looked to the technology to mediate and enhance their instruction as well as promote active learning for students (Anderson, 2007; Eijkman, 2008; McLoughlin & Lee, 2010; Selwyn, 2010).”
Cultivating the Disposition to Understand in 21st Century University Education. (2011, background): “…of web 2.0, this term is typically used to refer to forms of online interaction which incorporate the following characteristics (Alexander, 2006; Anderson, 2007; CICLE, 2009; TLRP-TEL, 2008): the use of microcontent (small blocks of content such as a single blog post) rather than fixed web…”
Harvesting ambient geospatial information from social media feeds (2011, background): “…(2) harnessing the power of the crowd (e.g. crowdsourcing, see Howe 2006), (3) data on a massive scale, (4) participation-enabling architectures, (5) ubiquitous networking, and ﬁnally, (6) openness and transparency (see O’Reilly 2005; Anderson 2007; Batty et al. 2010; for further discussions).”
Why web 2.0 is good for learning and for research: principles and prototypes (2008, methodology): “Anderson [6] used a slightly different categorization of what he calls the “big ideas” of Web 2.”
Determinants of knowledge sharing using Web 2.0 technologies (2009, background): “which facilitate a more socially connected web where everyone is able to communicate, participate, collaborate and add to and edit the information space (Anderson, 2007; Ankolekar et al., 2008; Pachler and Daly, 2009; Rollett et al., 2007).”
New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries (2007, background): “These include blogs, wikis, multimedia sharing services, content syndication, podcasting and content tagging services (Anderson, 2007).”