Proclivity for Improvisation as a Predictor of Entrepreneurial Intentions

By Keith M. Hmieleski, Andrew C. Corbett. 2006

487 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation, Urban Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc49609b12dc300a7e0f3de4ae2031dd6f2b99a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Urban Studies

Citations in the corpus

Explaining the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship in emerging economies: The intermediate roles of absorptive capacity and improvisation (2017, unknown): “…learn and create and execute new plans in motion or in progress would appear important for entrepreneurially oriented firms to possess (Hmieleski & Corbett, 2006) (e.g., as decisions emerge Bon the spot^ to address unexpected problems resulting in new approaches and new ideas that…”
The Role of Entrepreneurial Passion and Creativity in Developing Entrepreneurial Intentions: Insights from American Homebrewers (2017, background): “Another study explored a construct of improvisation that has been found to influence the formation of entrepreneurial intentions (Hmieleski and Corbett 2006).”
Behaviours and entrepreneurial intention: Empirical findings about secondary students (2011, result): “Results point out the importance of entrepreneurship education in the promotion of the EI. These conclusions have support in others studies (Brice 2004; Hmieleski and Corbett 2006 ).”
From Opportunity Insight to Opportunity Intention: The Importance of Person–Situation Learning Match (2007, background): “While prior studies have focused on the determinants of people’s intention to start their own business (e.g., Hmieleski & Corbett, 2006; Krueger et al., 2000), this study focused on the predictors of specific intentions, given that a more general entrepreneurial intention is already present.”
Turning Agents into Psychological Principals: Aligning Interests of Non‐Owners Through Psychological Ownership (2013, unknown): “…permit us to conceptually distinguish it from related concepts such as improvisation (which also includes dimensions referring to pressure and persistence, see Hmieleski and Corbett, 2006, 2008) or proactiveness (which tends to neglect the idea generation dimension, see Bateman and Crant, 1993).”
Regional variations in entrepreneurial cognitions: Start-up intentions of university students in Spain (2011, background): “These choices, however, could be derived from social models that impact on the individual’s entrepreneurial intention (Hmieleski and Corbett 2006).”
A model of entrepreneurial intention: An application of the psychological and behavioral approaches (2012, background): “Also, it can be seen that theoretical and empirical research has associated psychological characteristics with entrepreneurship (Kennedy et al., 2003; Brice, 2004; Bhandari, 2006; Li, 2006; Hmieleski and Corbett, 2006; Florin et al., 2007).”
Individual Entrepreneurial Intent: Construct Clarification and Development of an Internationally Reliable Metric (2009, background): “Individual entrepreneurial intent has proven to be an important and continuing construct in entrepreneurship theory and research (Carr & Sequeira, 2007; Hmieleski & Corbett, 2006; Wilson et al., 2007).”
Entrepreneurs' dispositional positive affect: The potential benefits – and potential costs – of being “up” (2012, background): “For these reasons they can, and often must “make it up as they go along” (Baker et al., 2003; Baron, 2007; Hmieleski and Corbett, 2006; 2008).”
When does entrepreneurial self-efficacy enhance versus reduce firm performance? (2008, background): “…entrepreneurial hubris; environmental uncertainty; high growth; overconfi dence *Correspondence to: Keith M. Hmieleski, M. J. Neeley School of Business, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX 76129, U.S.A. E-mail: k.hmieleski@tcu.edu Copyright © 2008 Strategic Management Society Strat.”
The contrasting interaction effects of improvisational behavior with entrepreneurial self-efficacy on new venture performance and entrepreneur work satisfaction (2008, background): “Although work on improvisation is just beginning to emerge in entrepreneurship (e.g., Baker et al., 2003; Baker and Nelson, 2005; Hmieleski and Corbett, 2006), there have been several noteworthy investigations of improvisation within the context of larger, established organizations.”
Creativity and Entrepreneurial Intention in Young People (2011, background): “Hmieleski and Corbett (2006) also find that improvisation, a construct that is associated with creativity, accounts for a significant amount of variance in entrepreneurial intentions.”
The Dark Triad and Nascent Entrepreneurship: An Examination of Unproductive versus Productive Entrepreneurial Motives (2016, methodology): “Finally, to address concerns relating to the generalizability of undergraduate business student populations to older and more experienced adult populations, we used samples of both business undergraduates and MBA students (Hmieleski and Corbett 2006).”