The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University–Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments?

By David C. Mowery, Bhaven N. Sampat. 2004

564 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc0a6df33a8d32638e8d63c8258a09722df4e8cd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The research university, entrepreneurship and regional development: Research propositions and current evidence (2012, background): “…that this did not have the intended positive impact on commercialization of federally funded research results (Litan, Mitchell, and Reedy 2007) and that the current university ownership model might not be optimal in encouraging entrepreneurship (Mowery and Sampat 2005; Kenney and Patton 2009).”
Pathways to impact and the strategic role of universities: new evidence on the breadth and depth of university knowledge exchange in the UK and the factors constraining its development (2012, unknown): “This has led to critical evaluations of the institutions that have developed to promote the transfer of technology (Goktepe-Hulten, 2010; Owen- Smith and Powell, 2001; Siegel et al 2003a) and the impact of policy regimes and changes such as the Bayh Dole Act in the USA (Mowery and Sampet 2005; Sampe”
Government support for SME innovations in the regional industries: The case of government financial support program in South Korea (2014, background): “…more innovative environment by the benefit of proximity to the R&D centers of large firms and universities (Eom and Lee, 2010; Link and Scott, 2005; Mowery and Sampat, 2005; Faems et al., 2005; Belderbos et al., 6 Large firms are expected to rely more on market power in terms of product…”
Plus ca change: Industrial R&D in the “third industrial revolution” (2008, background): “Many of these initiatives cite the Bayh-Dole Act as a policy model (See Mowery and Sampat, 2004, for further discussion).”
Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations (2009, background): “These include the Bayh-Dole Act in the US and similar legislative initiatives in other countries, as well as governments’ attempts to increase ‘third stream engagement’ in universities through subsidies for technology transfer offices (Czarnitzki et al., 2009; Mowery and Sampat, 2005).”
Assessing the Regional Economic Development Impacts of Universities: A Review of Current Approaches (2007, background): “See Mowery and Sampat (2004) for a dissenting view.”
University Innovation and the Professor's Privilege (2016, unknown): “Moreover, the policy arguments – and literature on the Bayh-Dole Act more generally – tend to focus on university-owned IP as the mode of technology transfer from universities.”
Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model (2009, background): “best way to ensure the commercialization of university inventions (Geuna and Nesta 2006; Mowery and Sampat 2005 ).”
University-Industry Collaboration and Innovation in Emergent and Mature Industries in New Industrialized Countries (2013, background): “…transfer (e.g. creation of university Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs), definition of IPR, support for university spin offs) might be less effective for supporting university–industry collaboration and the growth of national high-technology sectors in NICs (OECD, 2005; Mowery and Sampat, 2005).”
Opening the ivory tower's door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of U.S. university spin-off companies (2005, background): “The extant literature has focused on patenting activities as a general trend and as a university-specific response to the Act (Nelson, 2001, Hall, 2005 and Mowery and Sampat, 2005), and on the establishment and operations of university technology transfer offices (Siegel et al., 2003).”
Performance of technology transfer offices in Germany (2011, unknown): “national innovation system (Mowery and Sampat 2005; Cosh and Hughes 2010; Audretsch et al. 2011), often highlighting the necessity of separate and specialized organizational units to manage industry–university collaborations (Link et al.”
Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions (2010, background): “…teaching quality; the balance of fundamental against more application-oriented research; and not least its effectiveness to stimulate higher levels of university–industry interaction and technology transfer (Mowery et al., 2001; Nelson, 2001; Mowery & Sampat, 2004; Sampat, 2006; Greenberg, 2007).”
Breaking the Ivory Tower: Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences in UK and Germany (2011, background): “…lsev ier .com/ locate / respol reaking the Ivory Tower: Academic Entrepreneurship in the ife Sciences in UK and Germany arolin Haeusslera,∗, Jeannette A. Colyvasb,∗∗ Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Institute for Innovation Research, Technology Management and Entrepreneurship, aulbachstr.”