Pathways to impact and the strategic role of universities: new evidence on the breadth and depth of university knowledge exchange in the UK and the factors constraining its development
258 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46b53439c780bbc8d2f10e88b0d731a42c15d9d5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Robert Huggins
- Piers Thompson
- Riccardo Fini
- Daniel Prokop
- Einar Rasmussen
- P. Benneworth
- Donald S. Siegel
- Johan Wiklund
Citations in the corpus
- Universities and open innovation: the determinants of network centrality (2019, background): “2012; Hughes and Kitson 2012).”
- Rethinking the Commercialization of Public Science: From Entrepreneurial Outcomes to Societal Impacts (2018, background): “However, the transfer of science and technology into application also occurs through many other pathways (Hughes & Kitson, 2012), often based on informal interactions between scientists and industry personnel, including consulting (Grimpe & Fier, 2010; Link, Siegel, & Bozeman, 2007).”
- From productive interactions to impact pathways: Understanding the key dimensions in developing SSH research societal impact (2019, background): “Finally, it is unsurprising that commercialization features as a pathway; several studies identified it as a pathway of science-society collaboration, even if its popularity with policymakers belies the extent to which it is used in practice (Hughes and Kitson 2012).”
- Public/private in higher education: a synthesis of economic and political approaches (2018, background): “For example, basic research in universities, together with its connections to commercial and non-pro fi t organisations, directly and indirectly generates both public and private goods in complex feedback loops (Hughes and Kitson 2012).”