Accepting Inequality Deters Responsibility: How Power Distance Decreases Charitable Behavior

257 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

All That Glitters Is Not Gold: How Others’ Status Influences the Effect of Power Distance Belief on Status Consumption (2016, unknown): “PDB, Status Consumption, and the Moderating Role of Others’ Status PDB has important implications for consumer responses, especially for those related to social hierarchy (Aaker 2006; Winterich and Zhang 2014).”
Who Is Wary of User Design? The Role of Power-Distance Beliefs in Preference for User-Designed Products (2019, methodology): “A recent stream of research has applied power-distance beliefs in consumer behavior contexts pertaining to self-control, charitable giving, and price–quality inferences (Lalwani and Forcum 2016; Winterich and Zhang 2014; Zhang, Winterich, and Mittal 2010).”
Organizations and Societal Economic Inequality: A Review and Way Forward (2020, methodology): “The studies we reviewed above show that individuals donate less when they accept inequality, but donate more when they believe that they have the power to change the situation (Han et al., 2017; Winterich & Zhang, 2014).”