Corporate Governance and Labour Management: An International Comparison

By Howard Gospel, A. Pendleton. 2004

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d978cd2f97e7611952e0a8f3bdfe25fbb8fb0ceb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Ruth V. Aguilera
2. M. Carney
3. Marc van Essen
4. Gregory Jackson
5. Michael A. Witt
6. Stephen G. Sapp
7. Vanessa M. Strike
8. A. Gaeremynck

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Ruth V. Aguilera
2. Marc van Essen
3. Gregory Jackson
4. M. Carney
5. Vanessa M. Strike
6. Stephen G. Sapp
7. Michael A. Witt
8. Igor Filatotchev

In Public Administration

1. Ruth V. Aguilera
2. Vanessa M. Strike
3. Stephen G. Sapp
4. Gregory Jackson
5. Marc van Essen
6. Michael A. Witt
7. M. Carney
8. B. Amable

Citations in the corpus

• Comparative and International Corporate Governance (2010, background): “Other approaches to corporate governance in economics and management are inspired by theories of the firm based on the unique nature of the employment relationship (Gospel & Pendleton, 2005 ).”
• Varieties of Capitalism and institutional comparative advantage: A test and reinterpretation (2016, background): “Indeed, a growing literature on the relation between corporate governance and employment patterns suggest more complex relationships between these variables than found in the Varieties of Capitalism literature (Gospel & Pendleton, 2003, 2005; Höpner, 2005).”
• The Impact of Corporate Governance on IFRS Adoption Choices (2013, background): “However, in Continental European firms the main agency conflict often occurs between majority and minority shareholders due to a more concentrated ownership structure (Faccio et al., 2001; Federowicz and Aguilera, 2003; Gospel and Pendleton, 2005; Thomsen et al., 2006; Pae et al., 2008).”
• Bundles of Firm Corporate Governance Practices: A Fuzzy Set Analysis (2013, unknown): “Employees’ lack of voice and participation in the firm governance process is complemented by a highly active job market through which employees can show their disagreement with the firm by opting to leave the company (Gospel & Pendleton, 2004; Hirschman, 1970; Jackson, 2005).”
• The Resilient Family Firm: Stakeholder Outcomes and Institutional Effects (2015, background): “Instead, we expect owners and managers to involve employees in decision making (Gospel & Pendleton, 2005).”
• Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis of the UK and the Us (2006, unknown): “…(Miller, 2000; Toms and Wright, 2005; Williams and Conley, 2005), or to country-by-country differences within the Continental European system, although S work has recently begun there as well (Federowicz and Aguilera, 2003; Aguilera, 2005; Clark and Wojcik, 2005; Gospel and Pendleton, 2005).”