Do the individuals closest to internet firms believe they are overvalued

By Paul Schultz, Mir A. Zaman. 2001

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d909b289c09bb5b4acd4e024cbbf6bfb0b52621d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Strategic IPO Underpricing, Information Momentum, and Lockup Expiration Selling (2002, unknown): “Schultz and Zaman (2001) suggest that some managers use exchange funds provided by investment banks to synthetically sell part of their stake in an IPO firm.”
Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time (2002, unknown): “This evidence is consistent with the idea that 10DuCharme, Rajgopal, and Sefcik (2001), Schultz and Zaman (2001), and Ofek and Richardson (2003), among others, examine various hypotheses for the high underpricing of US internet stocks.”
Caveat Venditor: Trust Asymmetries in Acquisitions of Entrepreneurial Firms (2009, methodology): “The sampled acquisitions were paid for with the buyers' equity, as was typical during the study time period (Schultz & Zaman, 2001) and is typical during merger waves in general (Rhodes- Kropf & Viswanathan, 2004).”
Executive Overconfidence and the Slippery Slope to Financial Misreporting (2012, unknown): “13 12 See Englmaier (2004), Heaton (2002), and Schultz and Zaman (2001) for surveys of the evidence.”
Going Public to Acquire? The Acquisition Motive in IPOs (2010, unknown): “Pagano, Panetta, and Zingales (1998) show that Italian firms went public not to finance future investments and growth, but rather to rebalance their capital structure and to exploit sectoral misvaluation.”
The Impact of Fundamentals on IPO Valuation (2009, unknown): “In the context of internet valuations, Schultz and Zaman (2001) and Ofek and Richardson (2003) provide evidence that in the late 1990s, the post-IPO valuations of internet IPOs were far greater than those of seasoned publicly traded stocks.”
The Marketing Role of Ipos: Evidence from Internet Stocks (2003, background): “1 Recent studies ( Schultz and Zaman, 2001; Ljungqvist and Wilhelm, 2003) examine incentives to”
Was There Too Little Entry During the Dot Com Era (2007, background): “Aggressive positions of insiders before March 2000 lead Schultz and Zaman (2001) to infer that insider and market beliefs did not diverge at that time.”
A Cross-Disciplinary Exploration of Entrepreneurship Research (2007, unknown): “…& Womack, 2001; Lowry & Shu, 2002; Ravid & Spiegel, 1997) and characteristics of financial institutions supporting and institutional forces surrounding entrepreneurial firms (Datta, Iskandar-Datta, & Patel, 1999; Gompers, 1996; P. M. Lee & Wahal, 2004; Mello & Parsons, 1998; Schultz & Zaman, 2001).”
Boards, CEOS, and Surviving a Financial Crisis: Evidence from the Internet Shakeout (2011, background): “Evidence suggests that firms rushed to go public in the height of the Internet bubble (Schultz and Zaman, 2001).”