Demographic category membership and leadership in small groups: A social identity analysis

By M. Hogg, Kelly S. Fielding, Daniel Johnson, Barbara M. Masser, Emily Russell, Alicia Svensson. 2006

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d83004f8a5f76d85f30b5463d95bcdb2aede76ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Breast is Best…But Not Everywhere: Ambivalent Sexism and Attitudes Toward Private and Public Breastfeeding (2009, methodology): “Although the ASI is most often used as a continuous measure, several published papers (e.g., Ford et al. 2001; Greenwood and Isbell 2002; Hogg et al. 2006) demonstrate its acceptable use as a dichotomized measure, particularly in an experimental design.”
The challenge of leading on unstable ground: Triggers that activate social identity faultlines (2009, background): “, 2006; Verkuyten, 2004), gender (Hogg et al., 2006), religion (Weaver & Agle, 2002), and immigrant status (Cheryan & Monin, 2005) that, in many parts of the world, have been historically associated with significant divisions or strife within society.”
The strong, sensitive type : Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders (2008, methodology): “Previous studies have assessed these beliefs using constructs such as attitudes toward women (Spence & Helmreich, 1978), interdependent/independent self construal (Guimond, Chatard, Martinot, Crisp, & Redersdorff, 2006), and ambivalent sexism (Glick & Fiske, 1996; Hogg et al., 2006).”
Leadership and followership identity processes: A multilevel review ☆ (2017, methodology): “We also synthesize work from multiple research paradigms, such as social psychology experimental studies (e.g., Haslam, Reicher, & Platow, 2011; Hogg et al., 2006; Platow & van Knippenberg, 2001), qualitative studies using in-depth interviews (e.g., Ibarra, 1999) and field studies on antecedents,…”
Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills (2018, methodology): “SIT has been used to explain and predict certain personal behaviors on the basis of, among other factors, interpersonal relationships in group situations (Hogg et al., 2006).”
Evaluation of and support for group prototypical leaders: a meta-analysis of twenty years of empirical research (2017, background): “Nineteen studies were correlational; 15 experimental; and one used a median split to generate prototypicality conditions (Hogg et al., 2006), so it was considered ‘mixed’ and was not used in the moderation analysis.”
The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments (2012, background): “For example research has shown that male leaders are evaluated more favourably than female leaders when the role or group norm is defined in more masculine terms and vice versa when the role or group norm is defined in less masculine terms (Eagly et al., 1995; Hogg et al., 2006).”
Revisiting followership through a social identity perspective: the role of collective follower emotion and action (2013, background): “…of the group's identity, i.e. prototypical (Fielding & Hogg, 1997; Hains, Hogg, & Duck, 1997; Haslam et al., 1998; Hogg, Hains, & Mason, 1998; Hogg et al., 2006), and also (2) to be engaging in behaviors that are perceived as being beneficial to upholding the salient group identity, i.e.…”