Now You See It, Now You Don't

By R. Bansal. Science's STKE, 2004

379 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Existing fluorescent protein highlighting techniques are irreversible and preclude repeated monitoring of the same protein to study its temporal regulation. Within cells, protein movement is regulated by many different factors and may be altered by changes in the cellular state. Measurements of protein dynamics are affected by the geometry of both the cells and the highlighted regions, and any changes in movement should ideally be assessed with data from a single cell. Ando et al. describe the engineering and application of a fluorescent protein, Dronpa, that can be reversibly highlighted to study spatiotemporal protein dynamics in living cells. The authors directly visualized the influx and efflux of a key regulator of intracellular signaling, mitogen-activated protein kinase, into and out of the nucleus. R. Ando, H. Mizuno, A. Miyawaki, Regulated fast nucleocytoplasmic shuttling observed by reversible protein highlighting. Science 306, 1370-1373 (2004). [Abstract] [Full Text]

Subfields: Cell Biology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7d927529178b9542850589e85a7fed73276e2be

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cell Biology

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

THE ACQUISITION OF LEXICAL AND GRAMMATICAL ASPECT (2004, neutral): “Research on cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition is grounded on psycholinguistic theories of speech processing and production 1992; Grosjean, 1997), as well as on specific proposals of cross-linguistic influence in second language acquisition (Kellerman, 1983).”
Avoidance of Phrasal Verbs: The Case of Chinese Learners of English (2004, background): “In a review of transfer literature, Kellerman (1983) found that " not everything that looks transferable is transferable " (p. 113).”
The role of L1 explicit metalinguistic knowledge in L3 oral production at the initial state* (2013, background): “This factor, as originally described by Kellerman (1983), and many after him, see e.g. Rothman (2011), can be related to explicit MLK.”
The scalpel model of third language acquisition (2017, background): “Please note that typology that conditions transfer is understood to be different from “psychotypology” in the sense of Kellerman (1983).”
Third or Additional Language Acquisition (2007, positive): “A similar position is taken by Ecke (2001) in his work on TOT (tip-ofthe-tongue) states with multilingual learners of German. He found that the L3, the target language itself, was the most frequent source of lexical influence for the learners he examined. This concerned the associations made in TOT ”
Coordinated induction by IL15 of a TCR-independent NKG2D signaling pathway converts CTL into lymphokine-activated killer cells in celiac disease. (2004, background): “ITAM-bearing DAP12 can induce a full signaling cascade resulting in cytolysis, cytokine Summary secretion, and proliferation (reviewed in Lanier, 2001; Raulet, 2003; Vivier et al., 2002; Yokoyama, 2000), whereas A major function of NKG2D linking innate and adaptive YXXM-bearing DAP10 seems to exert ”
Language attrition and theories of forgetting: A cross-disciplinary review (2004, background): “…most recently learned language (Shanon, 1991), the other foreign or native language (Meisel, 1983), the psycho-typologically closest other language (Kellerman, 1983), the most dominant language (Mägiste, 1986), The International Journal of Bilingualism or the language with the proficiency level…”
L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model (2011, background): “To be clear, by ‘psychotypology’ I am referring to a speaker’s perception of typological proximity in the sense of Kellerman (1983).”
Object pronouns in German L3 syntax: Evidence for the L2 status factor (2011, background): “Psychotypology, on the other hand, was coined as a term by Kellerman (1983) to denote the learner’s apprehension of linguistic similarities among languages.”
Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered* (2013, neutral): “To be clear, by conscious psychotypology I am referring to Kellerman’s (1983, 1986) definition, which relates to the learner’s conscious perception of typological relatedness. From a generative perspective, it is reasonable to reject a priori that consciousness would have anything to bear specifical”
Transfer and typological proximity in the context of second language processing (2002, background): “Zobl (1980) shows similar phenomena as does Kellerman (1983).”