Review of Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All

By E. Mann. 2014

1,014 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d6bf33720d6ae559b978ae7e9e6235450ed8440c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Sara Cothren Cook
2. Marisa Quaresma
3. Lauren W. Collins
4. João Ponte
5. P. Riccomini
6. Lisa L. Morin
7. J. Makonye

Citations in the corpus

• Teaching Functions Using a Realistic Mathematics Education Approach: A Theoretical Perspective (2014, background): “Reston, VA: NCTM. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2014.”
• Schema-Based Instruction for Mathematical Word Problem Solving: An Evidence-Based Review for Students With Learning Disabilities (2020, background): “Had we included studies that targeted participants with mathematics difficulties (as opposed to only including students with LD), SBI would likely be considered an EBP. However, given (a) the intention of the CEC (2014) standards to determine effective interventions for students with a clearly ident”
• Teachers’ professional practice conducting mathematical discussions (2016, background): “The importance of challenging students is highlighted by Potari and Jaworski (2002) and Schoenfeld (2014) and frames many current curriculum documents such as NCTM (2014).”