The impact of principal leadership behaviors on instructional practice and student engagement
By David M. Quinn. 2002
245 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d6987b1df6db761f0a13e7c4e09d5e8a35a35349
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Christine M. Neumerski
- J. B. Crockett
- D. A. Bays
- A. Hii
- George O. Odhiambo
- G. Black
- J. W. Peachey
- D. Parris
Citations in the corpus
- Rethinking Instructional Leadership, a Review (2013, background): “For example, Quinn (2002) found principal instructional leadership was related to frequent use of student-centered teaching.”
- Key Stakeholders' Perceptions of Effective School Leadership (2012, background): “…indirect effect principals can have on student achievement as found within the literature (Griffth, 2004; Hallinger et al., 1996; Leithwood, 2005; Quinn, 2002; Ross and Gray, 2006) but also illustrates the direct effect the principal’s decisions can have on a teacher’s ability to carry out…”
- A CORRELATIONAL ANALYSIS OF SERVANT LEADERSHIP AND SCHOOL CLIMATE (2010, background): “Effective leadership behaviors of school principals are critical to the climate of the school, as their choices infl uence student achievement (Halverson, 2004; Johnson & Uline, 2005; Norton, 2002; Quinn, 2002).”
- Investigating Instructional Leadership for Special Education (2007, background): “However, high visibility within the school building cannot ensure the quality of instruction (Quinn, 2002), and a principal’s limited knowledge of what special education is and why it is needed (see Kauffman & Hallahan, 2005) can compromise the delivery of specially designed instruction.”
- Instructional Leadership Influence on Collective Teacher Efficacy to Improve School Achievement (2011, unknown): “Researchers have concluded that principals who implement instructional leadership strategies in their schools can expect to positively influence student achievement and school outcomes (Barnett & McCormick, 2004; Day, 2000; Foster, 2005; Hallinger & Heck, 1998; Hallinger & McCary, 1990; Hoy, Sweetla”