Socio-Technological Regimes and Transition Contexts

By Frans Berkhout, Adrian P. L. Smith, Andrew Stirling. 2004

563 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5af6791932efa54e42277d9e00beeff2bd03509

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions (2005, background): “Despite the breadth of the regime concept, there is a tendency to treat regime transformation as a monolithic process dominated by rational action and neglecting important differences in context (Berkhout et al., 2004).”
Exploring the Transition Potential of Renewable Energy Communities (2015, unknown): “) and putting too much emphasis on technological niches (Berkhout, Smith, & Stirling, 2004; Geels, 2005), even though some more recent work has tried to address both challenges (Neuvonen et al., 2014).”
Assessing the Dutch Energy Transition Policy: How Does it Deal with Dilemmas of Managing Transitions? (2007, background): “So far the attention to transitions has not resulted in the changes in fiscal policies or in environmental policies that will be needed to change the energy supply system (Berkhout et al., 2004).”
Competing Claims on Natural Resources: What Role for Science? (2008, background): “A more encompassing approach such as this reflects current thinking on innovation and transition (Smits 2002 ,Berkhout et al. 2003, Grin et al. 2004).”
Environmental political economy, technological transitions and the state (2005, background): “In an interesting paper Berkhout, Smith and Stirling develop a critique of the ‘niche-based model of regime transformation’ which they understand to be ‘at the heart of this transition management project’.(28) They suggest transition management places too much emphasis on a ‘bottom-up’ (enterprise-d”
MANAGING TRANSITIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (2006, background): “As Berkhout et al. (2003) argue, we need a thicker, context enriched understanding of transitions.”
Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm? (2009, background): “Strategic niche management is advocated as an evolutionary element for system-oriented transition policy by Kemp et al. (1998) and Hoogma et al. (2002) but criticised by Berkhout et al. (2004) for being too much of a bottom-up strategy.”
International technology-oriented agreements to address climate change (2008, background): “A transition starts with the establishment and accumulation of technological niches, eventually leading to change of the larger technological landscape (Geels, 2004), although the way of bringing about these changes is disputed (Berkhout et al., 2003).”
Greening of the financial system and fuelling a sustainability transition (2018, background): “3 For a broad explanation of the model see Rip and Kemp (1998), Geels (2002), Berkhout et al. (2004).”
The Politics of Reflexive Governance: Challenges for Designing Adaptive Management and Transition Management (2011, background): “…politics might affect the performance of a transition arena, on what institutional grounds they can be handled so that learning and experimentation within the transition arena can take place, or how they can be strategically used for facilitating social–technical change (cf. Berkhout et al. 2004).”
Conceptualizing, Observing, and Influencing Social-Ecological Transitions (2009, background): “As Berkhout et al. (2004) have rightly acknowledged, the term transition is often used as an umbrella term for a multiplicity of phenomena and requires a clearer conceptual definition.”