Assessing the Dutch Energy Transition Policy: How Does it Deal with Dilemmas of Managing Transitions?

By René Kemp, Jan Rotmans, Derk A. Loorbach. 2007

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51985d0479e2eaf40494583b0c7fde05628d6e36

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. F. Kern
2. Jan Rotmans
3. René Kemp
4. P. Newell
5. J. Voss
6. Basil Bornemann
7. Jon Phillips
8. Adrian Smith

In Global and Planetary Change

1. H. El Bilali
2. F. Kern
3. René Kemp
4. Jan Rotmans
5. Adrian Smith
6. P. Newell
7. J. Voss
8. Erik Laes

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. P. Newell
2. F. Kern
3. J. Voss
4. I. Scrase
5. Adrian Smith
6. Marina Fischer‐Kowalski
7. René Kemp
8. Lucy Baker

Citations in the corpus

• A Comparison of Energy Transition Governance in Germany, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom (2014, background): “The ETP approach has been instrumental in introducing the idea of vision-guided energy governance in the Netherlands, albeit that strong choices on potentially incompatible visions have been avoided so far: for instance, fossil-fuel based visions centered on carbon capture and storage are accepted a”
• The Political Economy of Energy Transitions: The Case of South Africa (2014, background): “Meanwhile, a ‘transition management’ (TM) approach, such as that advocated by Kemp et al. (2007), is said to offer ‘a practical toolbox of techniques to encourage collaboration among innovators’ (Meadowcroft 2011: 71).”
• Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy (2008, unknown): “In 2002, Hoogma et al. acknowledged”
• Transition heuristic frameworks in research on agro-food sustainability transitions (2020, background): “It emphasises the importance of creating visions in so-called transition arenas before starting niche experiments (Rotmans et al. 2001; Kemp et al. 2007; Loorbach 2007; Schot and Geels 2008).”
• The transitions storyline in Dutch environmental policy (2009, background): “Some early advocates are troubled by transition policy diluting the original intent of ‘their’ storyline (Kemp et al. 2007).”
• Energy Sustainability: A Pragmatic Approach and Illustrations (2009, unknown): “, the Netherlands [51,52].”
• The Politics of Reflexive Governance: Challenges for Designing Adaptive Management and Transition Management (2011, background): “Certainly the transition arena is meant to span various levels and sectors of governance (Kemp et al. 2007a), and institutional changes are referred to as potential impact factors for substantial transition pathways (Kemp and Loorbach 2006).”
• Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions (2016, unknown): “This combination would enable a governance approach that accommodates both goal-oriented directionality and emergent experimentation and learning 88 .”
• Conceptualizing, Observing, and Influencing Social-Ecological Transitions (2009, background): “Although the Dutch approach is now strengthening its theoretical base, learning from a growing empirical portfolio of case studies (Kemp et al. 2007, Loorbach 2007), the Viennese approach is increasingly used and tried out in practical political contexts (Haas et al. 2004, Stone 2006, Gaube et al.…”
• Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm? (2009, background): “Transition management is a multilevel model of governance for shaping processes of co-evolution using visions, transition experiments and cycles of learning and adaptation (Kemp et al., 2007b).”
• The (non-)politics of managing low carbon socio-technical transitions (2009, background): “Indeed, ‘distributed control’ is identified by Kemp et al. (2007) as a ‘key problem’ for TM.”